1. Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!

Money spent v Final league position

Discussion in 'Southampton' started by jonny 'hasen' shuttle, May 19, 2016.

  1. jonny 'hasen' shuttle

    jonny 'hasen' shuttle Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2011
    Messages:
    2,481
    Likes Received:
    1,785
    #1
  2. RSS

    RSS Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 25, 2011
    Messages:
    11,164
    Likes Received:
    9,392
    I thought we had spent less than we have made on players!?
     
    #2
  3. TheSecondStain

    TheSecondStain Needs an early night

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2011
    Messages:
    39,383
    Likes Received:
    8,819
    The previous season, we made a very healthy profit on transfers.
     
    #3
  4. RSS

    RSS Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 25, 2011
    Messages:
    11,164
    Likes Received:
    9,392
    I think I'm getting my seasons mixed up. The 2014/15 season we made massive profit on players? Did we make that much of a loss this season?
     
    #4
  5. TheSecondStain

    TheSecondStain Needs an early night

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2011
    Messages:
    39,383
    Likes Received:
    8,819
    Well £4.8M is Charlie Austin, plus a tiny bit [£0.8M]. I'm not sure how Black Box planned Austin was. He may have been the closest the Liebherr Saints ever come to taking a punt on a player, but he will be worth the small loss, imo. It's not much in the great PL scheme of things.
     
    #5
  6. RSS

    RSS Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 25, 2011
    Messages:
    11,164
    Likes Received:
    9,392
    But the article says "Tottenham Hotspur were the only top-flight club to make a profit from their transfer dealings over the last two windows." Ahhh pennies just dropped. Last two windows. Winter and summer. I read it as last two seasons in which case we'd be in profit on player sales.

    Oh and I agree about Austin. Worth it just for that goal at Old Trafford, but, I'm still confident he'll do well for us next season!
     
    #6

  7. AllotedTime

    AllotedTime Active Member

    Joined:
    May 13, 2011
    Messages:
    238
    Likes Received:
    50
    Interesting, but there are too many flaws in this analysis for any of the conclusions to be credible. For example, it ignores net transfer spending in previous years, plus it only looks at transfer fees and ignore wages and signing on bonuses.
     
    #7
    Qwerty likes this.
  8. hotbovril

    hotbovril Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 8, 2011
    Messages:
    2,763
    Likes Received:
    1,624
    Indeed. You can make statistics show pretty much anything you want. For example, 19 Premier League Clubs spent £4m less than Southampton on Charlie Austin :)
     
    #8
  9. Ronnie Hotdog (MLsfc)

    Ronnie Hotdog (MLsfc) Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 22, 2012
    Messages:
    8,659
    Likes Received:
    9,001
    It is fairly narrow as it ignores all other spending, but I think it still makes for interesting reading.
     
    #9
  10. Bill Hill

    Bill Hill Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2015
    Messages:
    923
    Likes Received:
    721
    Interesting. I know it's a crude figure but
    When I saw ours at a whopping 4.8m I must admit my first thought was not its great we run a tight ship it was if we had come out anywhere near the other medium sized clubs we would be in the champions league now. All I hindsight of course.
     
    #10

Share This Page