Technically looking after it until they arrived... I said it was unfair to the jews but the Zionists didn't seem to care either But hey I only wanted you to see that Ken was right about Nazi support of Zionism...and I have Nice discussion
So Ken was right about Hitlers support for Zionism during the 1932 election that Hitler didn't win because of an agreement signed in August 1933 after 3 months of negotiations? Are you sure you read that Mindy?
Oh ffs. What is Mindy arguing? He is arguing that Ken was right to say that Hitler supported Zionism when he won the 1932 election. He used as evidence of Hitlers support for Zionism an agreement that was signed nearly 18 months later that was signed after just three months negotiation. Not to mention the fact that Hitler didn't actually win the 1932 election, Hindenburg did. And further proof that Hitler wasn't a supporter of Zionism is actually in the article that Mindy posted and which the failmiester failed to notice. It states that Hitler was against the agreement when it was first signed. There is no directing the argument from me. It is what it is. Mindy has proved Ken wrong so well done Mindy.
I didn't say anything about an election I said he supported Zionists by agreeing to send jews to Palestine, which he eventually did. Hitler not agreeing during negotiations is your best shot Lol
If I didn't agree with something then I wouldn't agree to it lol "Initially, Hitler criticized the agreement, but reversed his opinion and supported it in the period 1937-1939. After the invasion of Poland and the onset of World War II in 1939, the practical continuation of the Haavara agreement became impossible."
I know you didn't say anything about an election, Ken did you trumpet. He made that statement and that's what we have been discussing. Ffs you're hard work. Ken made the statement and you actually posted on this thread that he was stating historical fact. I broke down the statement, proved it was a load of pish and you still back up your labour man. If it was a Tory that said the same thing you would be wanting him strung up. WTF are you on about "Hitler didn't agree with it during negotiations "? Where does it say that in the article you posted. While you are at it where does it say he "fully supported it"? Ffs Mindy , you went back and read it and still managed to get it wrong. You are a spanner in the extreme mate. I actually like that about you tbf
The outrage was about Hitler supporting Zionism Not one person discussed Hitlers rise to power It's nothing to do with Labour. He was right and those who were outraged were wrong He was arguing with a fellow labour MP and this is how it all started
No, the outrage was and is about Ken Livingston trying to justify another Labour MP's totally anti semitic social media posts by claiming Hitler was a Zionist. Any **** with half a brain knows that is not the case. One person did, Ken Livingston. Unfortunately, like you he was a wee a bit off the mark. He is/was a leading figure in the Labour party and a member of its national executive He was the Mayor of London as a member and candidate for the Labour party. How the **** can you say that it has nothing to do with the labour party? He wasn't right?. The only thing about the statement he made was there was indeed a year named 1932. He wasn't arguing with a fellow labour MP he was being interviewed on a radio programme. Mindy fail fail fail fail
