If you'd like to PM me a list of email addresses for everyone you think should have been invited, then I will gladly feed if back to the group, as it stands the email group used was the only one I've seen.
There are no winners The club we love and support is going to lose out big time as it loses many current supporters and supporters of the future We are all losers
I'll get them to see what they've got and perhaps get them to send it to the group, but can you pass the info to the group that they missed some while they look for it, perhaps others have a wider list than you. Seems odd if some get a different list to others, but it's a shame nobody checked. Ta.
I'm afraid if I haven't the slightest idea what you're referring to, I'm unable to do anything about it.
So those who accepted thre proposal didn't do so because they stood to make a personal gain? What about the two who sold information to David Burns (BA Hons)?
You don't need them. If you just pass the message to the group, so at least the wider circle knows. Seemingly they were included in the group invite for the strawberry presentation but couldn't make it.
As far as I know the only person who had the e-mail addresses of all the people that ever attended FWG meetings is James Mooney. At one of those meetings he promised to share that list with everyone on the FWG and like lots of other things he said he would do - he didn't.
Who are the people who have been excluded from the email discussion, If they generally go then their names are public, so name them. I'd guess if they weren't at the first meeting discussing the scheme then the club are unlikely to include them in subsequent email discussions as they hadn't signed the NDA. If they were invited to the meeting & didn't attend what do they expect? If they weren't invited to the meeting why didn't they pipe up at the time?
The email group about the Strawberry presentation is the one that's being used, if there were other people invited that aren't on that list, then I haven't the slightest idea who they are and I can't tell anyone to email them in future. This is getting surreal.
I can't quite see why it's being made into an issue, but the people concerned thank you for your assistance. They'll sort it themselves. I reckon the group wants to be inclusive, so I doubt the others will have an issue. As I said, it's a shame nobody checked, but there it is.
You want me tell the group to email people you think aren't currently being contacted, refuse to tell me who they are, then accuse me of being awkward.
I didn't accuse you of being awkward, I said I couldn't see what the issue is. It's quite simple, YOU don't need to pass the emails on at the moment or know who they are, it just needs the message passing to the group that some were missing. As that seems a tad tricky for you, the people concerned say they'll sort it themselves. If this is an example of how things proceed, it's surprising the meeting seemingly agreed a statement.
