Whats your politacal party and why?

ok lets say they dont for second

how is it any of what i wrote above?

 

is that it?

would it have been ok if it was a dead sheep?

or are taking the piss because Islam doesnt allow putting your knob in a dead pigs mouth and you think it should coz dave did it?

 

Depends on whether or not you think homosexuals should be punished for practicing homosexuality.

 

So nothing changes. ****ing hell you're either struggling or are happy enough that you are barred from being head of state of your own country due to your religion or what family you were born into.

Madness.

 

Do you think what our posh twat of a PM did whilst he was at Eton is a reflection of the British legal system?

 

That is no my decision than yours

In terms of practising homosexuality, I think you will find Islamically the rules are consistent for all.

As long as what goes on in the bedroom is in the bedroom then no one has issues. Its only the overt that is punished and is the same with hetro etc too

someone being gay is as relevant to me as someone who likes getting pissed on when having sex, if they tell me or ask me I would say I would say i dont like the idea of either, THATS true equality

 

I could lead Yorkshire's independence movement and declare myself King of York when we're independent. Nah, I'm not that bothered that the position of ceremonial Head of State is allocated to the House of Windsor. Wouldn't be that bothered if we became a republic.

 

deflection like a muthafucka

anyhoo the pig ****er has more say in the laws you see as the best than any muslim

 

That's rather vague. What would constitute overt to you?

 

Good. He's a posh **** but at least he legalised gay marriage.

 

considering you were the ''expert'' on islamic laws earlier I cant believe you want an explanation

But lets play

Overt to me ranges from telling me what you do (i dont care just as i dont what a man and wife do) to actually engaging in even kissing publicly. Again dont care if its a man and wife. Take that **** indoors

Islamically it would require 4 witnesses who actually witnessed the act itself. Again its not limited to homosexuals but equally applies to hetrosexuals eg in case of adultry

 

There was no point. Civil partnership already existed and the rights were there. He bowed to a couple of pressure groups. In the main gay people didnt give a ****

 

How many gay people do you know well?

 

So you believe two people, gay or straight, kissing in public should be 'punished'. Well at least we've cleared up the fact you're a massive ******.

 

quite a few in my own personal life. closest is probably my wifes 2 cousins

in my work I worked in the field of social exclusion and worked closely with LGBT groups

 

And most of them didn't give a **** about gay marriage?

 

I gave you 2 views. 1 I have no influence on and the other was a personal view

My personal view is I dont like it, I didnt mention punishment.

 

I was surprised how may didnt. I would say the majority didnt.

have you heard of the word ''hetronormative''

 

please log in to view this image

 

ooh look a meme