Even cut to 50k it's to much for the Championship, Shelvey will have a wage cut though. Mitro won't if rumors are true. Details of ‘Monster’ Newcastle contract offer to Mitrovic revealed by Belgian media please log in to view this image Saturday 18th July 2015 by Graham Porter Share The fine details of a ‘Monster’ contract Newcastle are claimed to have offered to Aleksandar Mitrovic have been made public by the Belgian Media. The offer to both Anderlecht and the striker will supposedly see Mitrovic at last become a Newcastle United player, unless the likes of Roma, Porto, or Benfica match the terms… Having been left out of the last two friendlies in anticipation of his imminent transfer (somewhere..), Mitrovic will also miss the glamour friendly tomorrow against Lazio – the league season kicking off the following Sunday against Waasland Beveren. Belgian newspaper Het Nieuwsblad report that both clubs are now fed up with the delay, which I think we can all relate to. They go on to say that the father and brother of Aleksandar Mitrovic, accompanied by their lawyer, met Anderlecht General Manager, Herman Van Holsbeeck to discuss the player’s departure and to see if there had been contact from any other club… According to their information, Het Nieuwsblad have revealed the following contract details offered by Newcastle United: Anderlecht will receive 16.5m euros (£11.5m) plus bonuses if Mitrovic reaches certain landmarks. Of that 16.5m euros, Partizan Belgrade will receive 2.3m euros (£1.6m), which is their 20% sell-on clause agreed when Anderlecht paid them 5m euros for the striker. Anderlecht will also receive 5% of any subsequent sale of Mitrovic by Newcastle. please log in to view this image Mitrovic would receive 2.4m euros (£1.7m basic pay – £33,000 a week) Elsewhere in the Belgian media, it is also reported that there will be big performance related bonuses to clinch the deal on top of his basic wage. Mitrovic will be paid 23,500 euros (£16,000) for each Newcastle win and 11,700 euros (£8,000) for each draw. Based on last season’s Premier League results (10 wins, 9 draws), that would have seen Mitrovic receive approximately an extra £232,000, adding on average £5,000 to his weekly pay. - See more at: http://www.themag.co.uk/2015/07/det...vealed-by-belgian-media/#sthash.ionpkFfN.dpuf btw that 2nd picture means lick a minge where I come from
And who's under the same contract from when Quinn was at the club. He left over 4 years ago, Everybody still here from the time are on new contracts issued after he left. Quinn knows jack ****. Yesterday man, long gone.
I can't see Newcastle being affected next season, financially, going off their figures released last week. Also they'll have more than enough to cover operating costs next season even on PL wages, especially if they sell a few of their squad who won't stay. They'll face a much bigger problem if they don't get straight back into the PL, the following season. If they do get straight back up, then they'll have to be clever in the transfer market for a year or two. I think they need this relegation and I think their fans know it after their latest sham of a display.
As a sunderland fan it's better than them having clauses in all their contracts, it certainly levels the playing field a bit more financially given we're due to break even this Summer(Apparently) The problem is is if the big stars get told they can't leave so they play up, next thing they're on loan with the club still copping a lot of the wages, knock on effect is less freedom in the transfer market for their actual team. Defo better for us they don't have clauses. It throws up all manner of potential problems.
I suppose you could look at it that way, for me their biggest issue would be getting a manager in who could get them up at the first time of asking assuming Benitez doesn't fancy a year in the Championship. Last time Newcastle went down, they were in a **** state financially and they walked it, in my opinion they'll have no trouble at all attracting the best players to their club from that league, that's why it's all about the manager... get that wrong and they could set themselves back 5 years.
Well, I'm afraid I don't know better than Quinn. Perhaps you would care no give us a bit of your fake better knowledge? That would be so interesting. Laughable at very least.
Yet again you prove it's you with the chip. Somebody disagrees and out comes the abuse just because you don't like them, what a lovely well mannered old man you are It's pretty simple. No players at the club are on the same contract as when Quinn was in charge. The Club contacted the Telegraph(not Guardian sorry) after it was published wrongly in the press that we had no relegation clauses, confirming and I Quote. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/football...am-allardyce-will-stay-even-if-he-fails-to-k/ There's my fake 'knowledge'. An article from this month not 4 years ago ****ing dickhead. Now for you to back your comments with proof. You could start by listing the many players still under a Quinn contract you need to prove your fantastic reliable knowledge. Prick. You're a ****ing disgrace to your generation you are.
I dunno why you bother giving the crispy old ****ing scab the time of day mate, he won't remember he was even talking to you, he'll be off feeding the ducks, probably trying to kick them.
@The Relic Wes Brown http://www.chroniclelive.co.uk/sport/football/football-news/wes-brown-signs-new-one-year-9445667 John O'Shea http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/29650944 Lee Cattermole http://www.theguardian.com/football...signs-five-year-contract-extension-sunderland Seb Larsson http://www.theguardian.com/football/2014/jun/03/sebastian-larsson-three-year-contract-sunderland THERE ARE NO OTHER PLAYERS STILL AT THE CLUB FOR WHEN QUINN WAS HERE!!!!!!
He's come out of flea infested little hole to puff his chest out with me. No bother in showing him up. Done it with ease. He'll be off back hiding behind his ignore button now.
Nice edit mate. Sorry you'll have to fight this one alone. As the original unedited post set my alarm bells ringing.
I saw it. Yes its your user name.probably wouldnt give a **** people calling you it. It was the context whch got me baffled.
I've called myself a bellend as joke and not bothered if people say it as joke, Relic doesn't joke with me, in which case I'll take it with the sentiments it was meant. It's only right. The context is a ****ing bizarre as the other stuff he post. He's turning into Monty. Seriously though. He's an old man and his posts are getting stranger by the week, very few make sense. I'm not fond of him because of the chip he's got with me but wouldn't wish the worst on him. So I hope it's not early signs of you know what.
It's that sort of thing that makes folk like me and Bri look like we're bullying the ****ing disgusting old toad for no reason, then everybody says we're going in too hard... "Oh leave him alone, he means no harm, he only posts about 1923 and you go in on him and I like his posts, blah ****ing blah". Cry me a ****ing river.
Struggle to believe our players don't have relegation clauses. It's a standard part of the modern day footballer's contract, and this is Mike Ashley we're talking about. Wouldn't be quick to jump to conclusions based on reports in the papers.
