It's not wumming, you are paranoid, and that's a symptom of the small man syndrome that Spurs fans suffer from. The context was that it was posited that Spurs beating Chelsea in 2008 was no 'fluke' because you'd beaten them in the previous final, but that final was nearly 50 years previous, with none of the players, mangers or staff at those clubs involved. It was a laughable suggestion to try and link the two.
And you're waffling and talking bollocks in a desperate attempt to be proved right. I suggest you go back and read the posts. Bodanki asked when we had last beaten Chelsea in a cup final. The answer is 1967. It's you're anti Spurs obsession that's laughable!...
I'd suggest you are the one who needs to re-read them. Bodanki only asked that question on the back of the suggestion that it was no fluke because Spurs had beaten Chelsea in the previous final. But that previous final was 50 years previous
No, it's simple. You ask a straight question, you get the answer. The question was when was the last time Spurs beat Chelsea in a final. Answer, 1967. It's really quite straightforward.
What is stupid about answering a question with a direct answer? I would also suggest you look up the definition of the word, analogy!
I'll run through this again as you seem to be struggling with the concept of answering a direct question. Bodanki asked when was the last time Spurs beat Chelsea in a cup final? The answer is 1967. All clear now?...
Yes, but the question was when was the last time we beat them in a final before that. The answer, which is quite correct, is 1967.
I'll give you the benefit of the doubt and say that you're playing dumb on purpose, because you know you've been had.
Ok, I'll go through it again. That was already discussed.,Bodanki then asked when was the last time Spurs had beaten Chelsea in a final before that - 1967!
Not struggling with anything at all Simply pointing out that you are trying to play dumb because you know that Bodanki asked that question in the context of PNP claiming that 2008 was no fluke because you beat them in 1967. A laughable suggestion. You're making yourself look pretty silly over what everybody has already read.
