This election (which incidently still returned less than 50% for fina gail, in spite of all their seats), was subject to massive vote rigging. Some people later claimed they had spent the whole days voting dozens of times. Haven't got time to explain further atm. Got to do a reply to my rag doll, then got to dash.
I was about to ridicule your other post until I saw this. You really are a complete dickhead Where in the judgement did the judge comment on whether I had been told something or not, you ****ing moron ? And how did you become enraged by my comment before I had written it ?
And in what way does my comment suggest I have failed to undertake research ? Which of the following of my comments is incorrect then, in your 'opinion' ? : a) the girl contacted Johnson in the hope of a sexual encounter b) the girl was sexually aroused during the incident c) apparently after becoming upset about Johnson, she then contacted another member of the team in the same manner she contacted Johnson d) the parents were aware of the relationship with Johnson and allowed it to continue Please feel free to quote the judge in telling me i've got any of these points factually wrong twat.
I am. And i've bust my ipad. So I doubt i'll be on much the next few days. Will try to come on to ridicule BRB as much as he gives me chance to though.
"some people claim" - it seems a lot of people claimed a lot of things in order to back up your nonsense, either cite it or shut the **** up
You really are a glutton for punishment ! Just for a bit of fun, let's give you the benefit of the doubt for a minute, and pretend that you have superpowers, that enable you to see into the future. If we make this assumption, then we can also assume that when you accused me of poorly researching this comment, you had seen into the future, and therefore knew that I was about to make the comment. Even then though, even assuming that you have such superhuman powers, your comment would still be complete bollocks. My comment (which you had anticipated with your supersight powers) was : "My understanding is that most people involved in the criminal justice system were amazed at the length of Johnson's sentence, and typically seem to think he should have got a something from a suspended sentence to 18 months inside." To which you replied (in advance) : "Your knowledge on it I thought was shocking to say the least and I'm not saying that to insult you. As you appear to like research did you actually bother to research the official summing up of the case/sentencing, because if your level of factual knowledge about Ireland is on par with your research on AJ, then no wonder the Irish lads are saying it's ill informed nonsense." So, you would be saying that by advising what I had been told by others, I had failed to undertake research to substantiate the comment, that I lacked factual knowledge, and that I should have read the judge's judgment before I posted this comment, to make sure I was getting it right. You then asked me for "proof". So, essentially what you are claiming I should have done, when advising what I had been told about what sentence many in the criminal justice system were expecting, was : - to present proof of what I had been told - to research various sources to check whether what I had been told was what I had been told Basically then, you would have been talking totally out of your ass. Not only is it not expected on here to provide proof of something you have been told, but I suspect that nobody has done it. ever. What did you expect ? a transcript of the ****ing conversation ? a pdf file of an email ? YOU ARE A ****ING LOON !!! The truth is, that you don't have superpowers. You can't see into the future. As with the other issues, like where you told me that I kept bringing Johnson up, then told me I was avoiding talking about Johnson, you were just trying to make some hopeless, desperate and invalid criticism of me. You call yourself the "thinker", but the truth is you are a moron. Your avatar talks about patience being a virtue. You don't have patience, you show dishonesty and desperation. Even when making premeditated attacks, you **** it up. You are hopeless at debating, completely illogical, and a liar.
We've already had 2. We've did Syria a few months ago, and had another one 2 or 3 weeks ago. Can't remember what about.
This is merely a trial run for the real commemoration which takes place from 24th to 29th of April, exactly 100 years after the rising...
