You also said.... Yeah, except this isn't some nonce randomly contacting children and brainwashing them into doing peverted acts with him, or duping them into an unwilling encounter that'll scar them for life. That's what the maximium setence is for. Not for going along with some throthing teenager who was hell bent into getting her rocks off with a footballer. If Johnson gets 6 years in prison for that, seeing as she contacted another footballer via social media right after she had had the encounter with Johnson, should the teenager also be convicted for encouraging him (and at least one other) to encourage her ? And seeing as her parents were aware of her flirting and encounter with Johnson, and allowed her to continue with it, should the parents be convicted for allowing her to encourage him ? ..... and you wonder why I reacted
and you think I'm going to apologise to you, if i'm wrong I would but based on what I have just highlighted to you....no ****ing chance
It was that comment at #282 I've highlighted that pissed me off if i'm honest, unlike you who quote 'there was no possible research that could have been done, in order for me to validate the comment that I made, which is that I had been told something'.... I had actually taken the trouble to read the Judge's actual report. Hence I found your comments offensive towards the child and the family but hey that's just my opinion. I'm done with you now and you can bang your keys as much has you like, I aint responding to you any more.
I give it at least another 200 years. Someone's probably writing a song about this thread even as we speak.
On not six oh six. Where RobSpur's internetting was bereft of fact For fifteen long pages, he took a good pasting 'Til the bold BRB fin'lly conquered his ass.
