Luke 1; 27 To a virgin espoused to a man named Joseph, of the house of David; and the virgin's name was Mary Luke 1; 32 ...and the Lord God shall give unto him the throne of his father David That's David who slew Goliath. David the first King of Israel.
and there in is the issue according to the gospel of matthew re Jesus genealogy ''16 Jacob the father of Joseph, the husband of Mary. Of her was born Jesus who is called the Messiah.'' (and what you quoted above) it is Joseph who is from the house of David, not Mary Joseph wasnt Jesus dad, so hwo was he from house of david? Marys dad was called Imran/umran/amram
interesting thing about that quote by a rabbi Luke claims that Mary was the cousin of Elizabeth, who he says was a descendant of Aaron the high priest,1 placing her in the tribe of Levi, not David’s tribe of Judah. Moreover, in Luke 2:4, the author writes that the reason it was necessary for Joseph and Mary to return to Bethlehem was because it was Joseph, not Mary, who was from the House of David
Coming from the most offended faith invented you don't see any harm in posting exclusively over the Easter weekend claiming Jesus was a muslim ?. There seems to be a huge inferiority complex from your insecure Muslim upbringing/brainwashing. I consider myself neutral but wouldn't dream of posting on a Ramadam thread pointing out that most of your core beliefs were stolen from the Jewish and Christian faiths.
not even slightly you address issues as they arise, so at christmas its christmas etc The issue of judaism and christianity is that islam claims to try and take things to the original religion of Abraham, its never claimed to be different from teh original only that the original was distorted. The genealogy of Mary is a case in point which was made ''to fit'' moreso after paul wrote what he did With regards to most offended, are you seriously suggesting that the issues over the last decade or so are an indicator of most offended? also worth noting is i dont disrespect with pics etc just question, are you not the one who is trying to offend? and failing as I, being the most offended as per your claim, have not responded in kind
Every single day some mental nut job blows something up and the main stream media blames the Muslims. Now you said today's bombing against the Easter egg seeking Christian children of Lahore was perpetrated by India and not Muslim extremists. Basically ALL suicide bombers are not muslims and perpetrated to make your religeon of peace look bad. The guy that tried to cut off the head of a Muslim in Glasgow for saying happy Easter to all faiths on facebook. Was he muslim or are we being tricked again ? It has nothing to do with not liking brown or black people the Muslim faith is not compatible with 2016 .
The problem in both cases is whether your sources are just the media Like I said I know the situation in Pakistan, the Park I visited myself (and you an google). The media reports dont tie in with the layout of the park. Plus we have relatives etc in lahore and the reports locally are different. So when BBC was reporting 69 deaths mainly kids, reports from back there were 72 people dead and that included 8 kids. Still a ****ty thing to go down and those responsible need taking down The Glasgow incident also has several background stories, some I have confirmed (and you can too if you can find the murdered guys FB). SO firstly the guy was from Ahmaddiyyah sect which isnt muslim and has been pronounced as such since the 70's due to certain beliefs they hold Again a ****ty thing to do BUT they guy was killed over some social media comments not selling easter eggs etc
I am sure there has been Not sure what you think I ma saying tbh, its not denial that atrocities happen and who is doing them or even saying its a good thing (certainly not advocating it) As a muslim myself I just dont accept certain methods of portrayal and its consequences Think about it those behind paris were known to be owning a bar and doing all sorts, how far removed are they (from their pics) to the long bearded muslim guy in muslim garbs who is getting attacked in our streets by those wanting pay back?
I don't believe there is a backlash with non muslims( 95% of us )attacking helpless muslims for the crimes of the few bad apples. Islam means dominate . You teach to recruit everyone into your club by force with nobody leaving alive. Your son can marry outside but the wife must convert ;if your daughter marries outside then she should be killed. Now that is not a good way to start a new life in a Western Country .
not true Islam literally means to submit. The word muslim is derived from two words and is not a noun as is often understood. Its a doing word, mu means to do and islam to submit so muslim is one who does submission Basic principle of Islam is that there is no compulsion in religion Wives of muslims must be women of the book (so no hindus or sikhs etc) and they certainly do not have to convert Abuse faced by muslims has risen from 4 in 10 in 2010 to 6 in 10 now (guardian survey) only 18% said they hadnt faced islamophobia Yet the violence perpetrated has been by a small minority and mostly against other muslims
Yes Submit my bad . I actually buy into the theory that Islam is blamed for way more than it's responsible for. USA Israel UK France Turkey Saudi Arabia are just dividing up the middle East with Russia Syria and Iran holding on . Putting millions of muslims into Europe will create a right wing reaction to cause a war against Islam and everyone else. The trouble is muslims are still stupid enough to fight for a God . Westerners fight for land money and resources. Your faith is a useful idiot.
I agree to a certain degree (may surprise you) What needs to be put in perspective is that in many countries which are islamic the populace is by enlarge uneducated and so easily lead. The job of muslims today would be to educate them so decisions made are correct and ot just political ploys Its sad that recently a man was hug for killing the guy he was body guard for in pakistan, there are mass protests going on even today. Its sad because the guy doing the killing claimed the politician he killed was being offensive yet no body questioned why he worked for a man who was openly from a sect seen aas non muslim In essence its like me working for you, an atheist (i presume), then killing you and saying as my defence it was because you were an atheist. head **** right?
My ex is muslim she considers our children Muslim . They are not because she had them with a non Muslim therefore I am the boss do not question the father . That is a sin. She escaped to the UK for a life of freedom but feels guilty and wants to submit to being a second class citizen. I could not give her that so she tried to convert me.. ****ing bonkers my daughter used to wear a hijab but I told her that she didn't have to so she doesn't. There is no middle ground .
