Yeah, except this isn't some nonce randomly contacting children and brainwashing them into doing peverted acts with him, or duping them into an unwilling encounter that'll scar them for life. That's what the maximium setence is for. Not for going along with some throthing teenager who was hell bent into getting her rocks off with a footballer. If Johnson gets 6 years in prison for that, seeing as she contacted another footballer via social media right after she had had the encounter with Johnson, should the teenager also be convicted for encouraging him (and at least one other) to encourage her ? And seeing as her parents were aware of her flirting and encounter with Johnson, and allowed her to continue with it, should the parents be convicted for allowing her to encourage him ?
I like all the comments like. "I hope Johnson gets brutally sodomised in jail or has his throat cut " She will be on an Anne Summers poster in knickers and a bra and interviewed on breakfast TV and loose women as a hero in no time. Bonkers
Some of them are. There's big Tam the tim. There's Fenian Freddie. There's Des the pape, he's a right taigy **** by the way. As for your other pish. If some nonce gets caught ****ing kids then I shall comment appropriately as I have done on this thread. Doesn't matter what the do for a living or which sky fairy they worship. What I don't do is slag nonces like Johnson off on the tinternet then send my kids to be taught by an organisation that has blatantly protected *****philes all over the world for centuries like wot you do ya silly ****.
But he didn't receive the maximum sentence which is 10 years. He also pleaded guilty to grooming, so the law was applied based on his own admission. What might have also been seen as an aggravating circumstance is the age disparity (am i right in thinking he is 28) - so that is a 13 year difference on contact in the eyes of the law with an under age child, that aggravating circumstance would have even applied to any lesser offence. He is also a so called 'professional' footballer which would require him to work in the community with vulnerable people ie hospital's, schools with sick, elderly and young, which in any other professional role would require him to be enhanced checked, he broke that professional trust. Now having been found guilty on at least two charges, that does make him a nonce using your term of words. As for the parents, I don't know what they did know, but I would hope if it was my daughter any contact/friendship made in his professional position would be non sexual. Yes, maybe in a year time the situation would have been different legally, but as another poster said on this thread, it's 16 for a reason, that's the law whether you agree with it or not because he exploited infatuation.
