I remember using that picture before and someone your end (I wont mention a name) didnt understand the picture. A few of you with myself had a good laugh about it at the time. Where you added this pic has brought back good memories
"I don't think you will find one critical or bad word from me about your side", Derek (aged 64 and a half). I have to say that had me laughing. please log in to view this image
Its a shame you still havent condemned the actions from yesterday. Instead "merely" pointing out a story which were just allegations as was PROVED not guilty after police investigations took place. Would you defend 1 of your own who was being accused of something vile which after investigations proved to be false allegations? I think you would and rightly so. So saying im defending an obnoxious player is clearly wrong. Disappointed you cant see and realise this. Also regarding those individuals who you call "filthy", I question if they are actual gasheads and I stated why. We Rovers fans know we are called 'GASHEADS'. Note that its 1 word. Obviously its a spelling error in that picture saying 'has head' which I can accept but I dont accept that any gashead would split that word into 2 words 'GAS HEAD'. Thats just not right. We dont do this thats why I questioned it. But I did go on to say IF they are indeed gasheads, they are only doing a stunt anyway. They havent actually got there dicks out. They are not actually pissing. They are pretending and poorly doing so at that as some got both their hands up which shows they are not pissing but just pissing about and pretending and you cant see any wee on the floor at all either. Its obviously a stunt. You know, a joke! Not really filthy is it. Now if they are gasheads or not, its right to defend them as you are using them to point score when clearly they aint doing anything wrong, certainly no filthy act thats you claim anyway. Just pulling a stunt. Disappointed again you cant see and realise this. Hopefully, maybe now though you can see why I have defended both Goddard and those individuals that you call obnoxious and filthy which evidence contradicts your opinion. I am deeply disappointed that you have taken the time and effort to post both the story and picture of the 2 cases accusing and condemning the found to be innocent yet still havent condemned your own players where evidence/pictures is there showing they are guilty involved in the disgusting acts. You go on about 1 or 2 stirring it but that is what you are doing yourself. You may not realise you are doing it but that is exactly what you are doing with showing the Goddard NON-story and a pic of guys standing against your club gates PRETENDING to urinate against them. No reason to bring this up if you are not stirring it. I defend the innocent and condemn the gulty. Anyway, thats enough from me on the matter as I made my point. If you understand where I am coming from then great. If you dont then its a shame but im happy to agree to disagree and move on Im off now, enjoy the rest of your day wiz
From MK Dons and an apology from their players http://www.mkdons.com/news/article/samir-carruthers-my-apology-3010589.aspx From Northampton & Strewsbury and an apology from the player http://www.ntfc.co.uk/news/article/...northampton-town-shrewsbury-town-3010390.aspx City are still investigating and I havent seen any apology either. Says it all.
None of our players pissed in glasses and threw glasses over a balcony, our players should apologize for being witnesses then
I would expect an apology from your player with the ponytail for his actions which was basically encouraging the (excuse the pun) piss poor behaviour. Or do you think laughing along and hugging the players while they were pissing in a cup is normal? I think the players of yours who were there, should apologise for the company that they keep in public. What they do in their own time behind closed doors is 1 thing. But being in public where their are thousands of people and lots of press officials around, they should know better. I certainly wouldnt be happy if I was Lansdown or Johnson seeing pictures of their players laughing along with the tarts who get their tits out in public and friends who get their dicks out in public, pissing in a glass and chucking the contents off the balcony. Although they didnt do the real crimes, they were a part of the group and laughing along with it all. They should have been professional when in public. Maybe remind their mates to behave or even leave that environment. Funny how the racecourse cancelled ALL the booking for today. Why didnt they cancel the booking for just those involved and let in the others who you call witnesses? Dont defend the undefendable
Well done Luke for apologising. Well done Luke for understanding that you put yourself in that situation and didnt remove yourself from it, so had something to apologise for please log in to view this image
Well done Johnson Even the City manager saying his players were guilty by association and should have removed themselves. From the Post.... While admitting his players were "guilty by association," City head coach Lee Johnson has decided there is no need for internal disciplinary action. Speaking at the club's weekly pre-match press conference at Failand this morning, Johnson admitted: "This incident is a stark reminder to footballers that they need to be mindful of who they are representing and who they keep company with. "They are representing the city, the club and football in general and they need to be role models. With way people take pictures now, you have to be doubly careful you don't get caught in the crossfire." http://www.bristolpost.co.uk/Bristo...tory-28942470-detail/story.html#ixzz439mPmzvG
I think LJ got it right. Nobody in any way shape or form thinks that what the players did is acceptable. Any person in that group while not doing it themselves has to accept that the image portray was not good. An apology was the minimum.
