For Chelsea to be in 4th place now, Hiddink would have needed to have won 37 out of 39 league points.
I meant the last 13 games since Hiddink took over. Bit harsh to criticism him for Chelsea not yet being in the top 4.
So he's matched City's record in that time. To have overtaken them you would have needed to have won 12 and drawn 1 of the 13 games. Do you think he's failed because he doesn't have a near 100% record?
Oh he hasn't failed. It was always a short-term fix and I was under no illusion that we would finish top 4.
You said he should be in the top 4 by now. That would have required 37 out of the 39 available points. Quite frankly a ludicrous expectation.
33 off 36. I agree it is a huge ask. But had we taken 4 or 5 more points we will still be in the hunt for CL. 22 off 36 is far too less. May be good for a mid table team like you but not for Champions
Had you won every game this season you'd be on for a Quadruple but that didn't happen. You are a mid table team. In fact you've only recently become a mid table team having been a bottom of the table team for much of the season. Hiddink has dragged you to safety. The fact you still think you should be winning points (11 wins in every 12 games!) like a title challenging team explains why you're so frustrated and deluded.
Kopite levels of delusion That side is where it is for a reason, it's bang average. Full of precious little egos and a striker with anger management issues. 33 from 36? ****ing lol
To mugs, I didn't ask for 32 off 36 points. All I said was 26 or 27 off 36 points would have made it interesting in the last 10 games.
