Rich Toff let off for child porn

He's no longer employed as a footballer, can't get a gig for love nor money, quite a high profile case like this one. So a convicted rapist cannot find a club, mainly due to the public outcry, so I can't see Johnson - a convicted *****phile - getting one.

I think the common consensus is that his career is over, you may disagree as is your right, but I think you may be in a minority of one...if you actually believe it, which I suspect you actually don't.

 

Probably and hopefully for England too, pick your best team is the way. If we hadn't have dropped John Terry for some racist thing he said we'd probably have won another world cup and a Euro cup.

 

He's not a convicted *****phile. Maybe he won't find a club that wants to take him on but Graham Rix is still involved in the game and he actually ****ed a fifteen year old and was much older than Johnson at the time.

Also you used the words "not allowed".

 

Pardon?

 

Wit is it wea the Nigels in this place, they seem nonced up tae ****.

 

Ok it's wikipedia but first couple of sentences...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/****philia

 

I wonder if he'll explain, i'm intrigued.

 

That's the wrong spelling for starters so I'll pass but I doubt the torches and pitchfork brigade will pay much heed to literal defintions anyway. Johnson is a *****phile as far as I (and just about everyone else) is concerned.

 

The whole prepubescent thing is a cop out. Technically it means you could have situation that a bloke having sex with a 13 yr old who hasnt reached puberty is a *****phile, yet having sex with an 11 yr old (a younger child) who has reached puberty isnt a *****phile! It's ridiculous. It's all *****philia.

 

My understanding is that a peadophile is an adult who is sexually attracted to children.

Johnson isn't sexually attracted to children, he was sexually attracted to a teenager who had the physical form of a woman.

 

Some teenagers are children though?

Not sure about her physical form tbh. But here's the thing I don't get. This bloke could pull any bit of skirt nearer his age on any night out.... But he goes to that extent to fumble a 15 yr old. Strange.

I dont think his mugshot done him any favours. Looks a right *****.

 

Doesn't matter what you and the baying mob believe*, the FACT is that this case isn't about *****philia.

*I'm always a tad suspicious about those who shout the loudest...

 

It really does not matter what her physical form is if she was 14 when the grooming began, and 15 when the abuse started though.

 

Yep... best just to keep quiet like the BBC.

 

And I'm more than a tad suspicious about people defending the indefensible.

Besides, it does actually matter what the baying mob believe, its them who attend football matches, as Ched Evans discovered to his cost.

 

It depends what you mean by, "does not matter".

In the eyes of the law it makes no difference whatsoever.

But if you're talking about whether he's a peadophile - ie sexually attracted to children - then whether the individual he was attracted to looked like a child or a woman, makes quite a lot of difference I would have thought.

 

I personally find baying mobs, just about more objectionable and vile than any other element of society. Particuarly when their inconsidered hatred and bile is clothed in the veil of moral virtue.

 

Does it make any difference where the "law" is concerned?

He "groomed" a child. He had sexual contact with a child.

Anything else is pure semantics.

 

Ummm, where am I defending it?

 

But you were the one who insisted he was a peadophile ?

It was you who insisted on the use of that particular word.