HAIG in angry response shock of the decade. Do you really think you're convincing anybody that you did that on purpose ? And if you did, then you are admitting that you made a prick of yourself entirely on purpose
That's frustration, not anger. Now, I will ask you a second time: do you agreed with an Arsenal legend, that Wenger should be sacked if either Leicester or Spurs finish above Arsenal? In respect of which ever answer you give, please state why.
Pixie, I will ask you for a third time: do you agree with Arsenal legend Paul Merson that, in the event that either Leicester or Spurs finish above Arsenal Wenger should be sacked. If not, why not?
I've told you before, you have zero privileges to demand answers from me given the amount of my questions you've bottled. You've even bottling one on this thread. How many games did Merson play in the 'Invincibles' team ?
Is that because another one of your wum threads has gone awry and people are taking the piss out of you ?
Pixie, I will ask you for a fourth and final time: do you agree with Arsenal legend Paul Merson that, in the event that either Leicester or Spurs finish above Arsenal Wenger should be sacked. If not, why not? Avoid the question and you will have shown yourself to be a pussy, not just to this board, but (more importantly) to the board that you purport to moderate.
Given that I have said that Merson is a bellend, what do you think ? Also why are you bottling my question about how many games Merson played in the invincibles team ?
Okay, so (cryptically) you are saying that Merson is wrong to say that Wenger ought to be sacked if either Leicester or Spurs finish above Arsenal. Why do you (cryptically) say that?
Because it shouldn't make a jot of difference what any other team does. Now, stop bottling my question. How many games did Merson play for the invincibles team at Arsenal ?
So, just to absolutely bottom this out, you are saying that an Arsenal legend is wrong to suggest that, in the event that either lowly Leicester or Spurs achieve what Wenger has spend £billions in wages over the last decade trying to achieve, Wenger ought to get the sack?
Hoddle didn't say anything about the rights of the disabled, did he? He merely voiced his religious views and was openly discriminated against.
... he offended a huge number of people .. let's not trivialise it ... anbody with a family member disabled by birth complications being told that they are only getting what they deserve due to do how they lived in a previous life has, in my book, every right to be outraged ... just another form of religious extremism for me ... and my only intolerance in life is for the intlolerant ... A man's religion, like his politics are his own affair as far as I'm concerned ... and perhaps best kept private.
All religions have the potential to offend. Sacking someone over what is a fairly mainstream religious view is excessive.
I hate this kind of hypocrisy! This might come as something of a shock to you, Bambi, but according to Christian dogma, any child born outside wedlock is condemned to Hell. Go and read your Bible, pal. Were you born outside wedlock? Do you have a child that was born out of wedlock? Do you have a brother or sister born out of wedlock? Or a nephew or niece? If so, how do you feel about them all going to Hell, Bambi? Don't blame Hoddle for that, pal, blame the Church. Or, do us all a favour, and count every vicar, priest, Bishop, Pope, Wizard, fortune teller, etc as a fear-mongering fraud. In the meantime, drop the faux moral outrage.
... I wouldn't accept that some of the things Hoddle said represented a fairly mainstream religious view ... persoanlly I found them nothing but abhorant ... for me there is little difference between religious, ethnic or nationalistic intolerance in that they all seek to somehow legitimise or justify the unjustifiable .... I admired Hoddle immensely as a footballer ... but I have no time for him as a human being I'm afraid. Won't be commenting on this topic again as it is too emotive in my view.
