The trial of Adam Johnson (part 2)

She's described him as a 'bit creepy' in her cross examination.

There are just some lines that aren't crossed.

 

Speak to me, not about me

 

I was on about her, not you

It makes perfect sense, if he had gone with a shy quiet girl who doesn't open up, then this might not have come out

 

After describing herself as comfortable with the situation in her video statements.

 

Did you mean me, AJ, or the girl?

 

Exactly.

 

Good question. Unlucky if he meant you. Pipping those two over the line

 

Did i mention any names?

You are wrspped up in this case a lot more than me.

 

You've paraphrased my comments, nobody else has mentioned capital punishment or shooting in the face.

I'm not offended mate, it's just the equivalent of being spoken about in a room and I'm standing right next to you.

 

Class

 

She's allowed to be a wrong'un, she's 15 years old. Legally not old enough to make the decisions he's forced her to make, so if it gets revealed that she's not very mature or that she's concealed certain things, or that she's not a valedictorian without a single blemish to her name, it makes her no different to billions of other kids around the world.

It doesn't sound to me at all like she's a wrong'un she sounds like a perfectly normal'un to me.

 

There has been othet tetms used.

Im not defending him,he,s going to the botty yard.

But one thing is for sure. If this wasnt an EX safc. This case would have been lucky to reach 10 replies.

Unless it was a mag also.

 

Well pick any board (that's at least a little bit busy) and go test that theory.

There's no agenda with Sunderland if that's what you're trying to say. Hardly any mention of the club on here now, it's all about the perve or the victim.

 

A cettain agenda for sure. Why does this case bother you so much?

I know you like watching far worse

 

Not you. AJ!

 

I'm just generally interested in criminal cases myself having a legal background and all

 

The case doesn't bother me at all, he's a high profile PL footballer who's trial is on as we speak, what do you think people should do out of interest, do you think everybody should just ignore it?

If you want to police what the board discusses mate then nominate yourself as a mod.

 

Oh nit picky.

Is me saying im not bothered,lack of interest any worse than saying shoot him in the face?

 

I don't know what you're getting at mate, I don't care that you're not bothered about this trial. I am not 'bothered' about it either but it's a subject that quite a few people have chatted about on here for a week now and it's cleared a few things up. If you think a child molester shouldn't be shot in the face then that's fine, I never expected anybody to share my view.

I'll tell you what, just for you since it's evidently affecting you so much, this'll be the last time I post on this thread and about Adam Johnson. I can't bear the thought of you being so upset.

 

. Aye ok.