The trial of Adam Johnson (part 2)

You might be right mate, he might have a great lawyer who'll somehow houdini this ****er out of this, but that would set precedent for every other *****/child groomer whatever you want to call them. You'd only need a bog standard lawyer fresh out of Uni to get you the same sentence as AJ. Essentially it'd be declassifying the crime.

 

The lads a grade A ****, penis hung in the Man City dressing room, left knacker hung in the Middlesbrough dressing room and right knacker hung in the Sunderland dressing room as a minimum sentence and as a reminder to Sam we need to replace the right knacker full back we have there now..

 

The Echo's summery from bottom to top

http://www.sunderlandecho.com/live/event?1834584

 

There's something I don't understand.

Charged with grooming - admitted.

Charged with sexual contact but not shagging - admitted. That would be the second time he met her.

What do the third and fourth charges - denied - refer to? Is he supposed to have met her a third and fourth time?

Or did he only meet her twice, when the girl says she gave him oral sex and he put his fingers in her vagina (which would be charges 3 & 4) and he says he didn't?

Typing these words makes me want to be sick to be honest, going into the detail of what the piece of **** is supposed to have done, I'm just trying to get my brain around what exactly he's accused of and how his posh brief is trying to get him off.

 

Imagine how her mum and dad feel, knowing they weren't there to protect her.

 

Being a dad with 3 daughters 2 of them in their teens one in her early twenties - so I know how first hand how dippy they can be and act, despite the fact they are academic, 'streetwise' and smart ... so they occasionally make bad judgement calls , they act irrationally they're generally being teenagers - so to say that a 15 year old could be partially to blame is unfair and just wrong (reading some of the comments on twitter today you'd think this situation was her fault) the law states rightly that it's abuse what has happened to her - Johnson has the best lawyer money can buy - I only hope that the jury will see through all the persuasive bluster and misdirection that he is being paid to do (I hope he can only sleep at night) - Johnson has already pleaded guilty he will deservedly serve time - if it was my daughter that was his victim I'd want to lynch the ****er !

 

Imagine they were comfortable with it until they had just read that post

 

Before this episode starts again and takes over the whole board. Am i correct that she met him twice, or have i missread due to any real lack of interest?

 

At least twice.

 

Ok. So when did the mucky stuff occur?

 

By the sounds of it, it was Johnson that initiated the contact and the girl went along with it.

 

I don't know exactly, I wasn't there.

I'd have to make assumptions so it's pointless.

 

He's a little tinker, isn't he

He'll be like this soon, I think

 

The trial just needs to be over now so that he gets what he deserves and everyone can move on and forget about him.

 

Who

 

I'd like it if he just didn't get the chance to state his defense, that's the punishment for lying.

Straight in the slammer.

 

My point being if it was the first time, why would she go back again?

 

Ronnie Pickering.

 

Because she was (just turned) 15 and she idolised him.

Go back to who you idolised as a 15 year old lad, probably some porn star, if she (or he, I'm assuming it wasn't John Holmes) coerced you into a rendez vous, you'd be all over that.

 

For me it was Denis Tueart

 

She idolised him that much, so as not to tell her SAFC supporting family she was about to make a trek to get shirts signed by a famous club player.

Then she did it again?