Match Day Thread West Ham V Liverpool

Back to the game. I imagine Sturridge will be on the bench again and hopefully come on, I don't think we will rush him. The aim should be for the final and Europa

 

Agreed.

 

So a guy that has done **** all but sit in the posh seats and watch all season should come straight into a cup final that somebody else has got you to?

 

well if he's your best player and best chance of scoring of course he should.

i get the point you are trying to make, but our team is ****ing ****e at the moment,t and we need all the help we can get lol.

 

Probably better to bring him on at half time if others are not performing, at least that way they will have had a chance and he will be fresh when the opposition tire.

 

It's not Sunday league. .......

If we bought someone like teix...where's China. ...teria then he'd be straight in too.

Having seen his Southampton game I'd say..... start and off after 60 personally.

 

So on a different tack....

Lfc took a beating off city u21 earlier

Liverpool: Bogdan, Alexander-Arnold (Gomes, 75), Hart (Brewitt, 45), Cleary, Maguire, Virtue, Lennon (Phillips, 45), O’Hanlon, Sinclair, Kent, Wilson

Sinclair and Kent played. Maguire did too.

Ojo, Smith, stewart, brannigan Randall did not.

I'd expect to see these guys play westham.

We drafted in Alexander and Lennon from u18 who played Thursday (and won) in 5th round of youth cup For this game.

We will have to see what west ham do.

 

Do your U21s often play on Sunday? we usually play Monday/Tuesday.

 

It depends.

This one was at anfield which is pretty rare. We are meant to be going back to tranmere after this year. Our games vary widely and we've played sat/sun/mon/Tues.

The majority would be in the week rather than weekend but there's quite a few Sunday games.

 

Not sure I can remember us ever playing on a Sunday (could be wrong though). We have played at OT a few times this season which has been nice, usually play at Leigh Sports Village which is about an hour away from me in the rush hour leaving little chance to get there.

 

Yes, he's part of our team and when fit scores goals. I'm not seeing anyone who through performance is keeping a fit Studge out. We'd be higher up the league if someone took on that role.

 

what was the point to bring back ward, ilori, wilson and kent if we're not going to play them?

questioned this at the time and still wondering why.

and if caulker don't play tomorrow, he'll be an odd signing in all.

 

go do some research

1. ward is on bench, bogdan is in u21s.

2. Ilori has played in cup.. was sent home by villa.

3. Wilson was sent home by crew

4. Kent is a child.

5. you forgot ojo.

 

ward has not played for us yet...could we not have found another loan for him?....again find another loan for him.....Kent needs to be playing, was dooing fine at coventry and we went and disturbed that.....i purposely didn't mention ojo...

replying back with kent is a child doesn't answer why we brought him back

 

No cos he's for the bench after having a successful loan. We all know mingolet is WORLD class cos klopp tells us so. we shoudl be happy bogdan is stuck out in the u21s and ryan fulton got sent on a laon to develop him.

Kent is a child, he's not ready... he was doing ok at coventry but klopp's style is not to farm out development to league 1 team coaches but to do the development himself. simple... same for Wilson, he's a child and wasn't successful on that loan so he wasted his time, crewe's time and missed out on his time with klopp.

as for purposely... yeah right... tell us another one

 

Because Klopp doesn't like loans. He likes all players to be nearby where he can (a) see how they're progressing and (b) be involved in their development.

Caulker on loan is a nothing transfer. He offered us depth at a time we were struggling for CB's. With Skrtel, Lovren and Sakho either back or soon to be back, Caulker isn't going to be needed much unless (a) he's breaking doors down in training and/or (b) we have another injury crisis at the back.

 

I don't care if we lose as long as we don't get embarrassed and played off the field.

 

we are slowly converting Caulker to striker lol.

as for him being a defender, well suppose he is no different to the other ones we have that are allegedly defenders.

 

so you'd take a 1-0 loss playing like we did against say stoke at home?

 

meh, personally i would rather we lost 10-0 and saw some ****ing effort from the players!

you can forgive them when they try, but effort is seriously lacking at mo, why i hope we see mainly youngsters, as they will at least try, the others dont give a **** as they ave already got their stupid ****ing wages!!!!!!