What hacked me off in the first place was her sense of entitlement and the assertion that if she had her request refused for a lifetime supply of chocolate she was looking into taking it further. Further than getting her money back which is all the law says she should receive. A pack of 8 Kit Kats from Tesco is only a pound but c*unty face there thinks she has hit the jackpot just for a bit of missing wafer. Sadly she is just another in a long line of f*ckholes who think that just because things don't go their way then the only solution is making demands and threats. She will be back on the Kit-Kats quicker than Savile on a mong.
Hit the jackpot? She asked for free kitkats, and as you mentioned they're cheap as ****. Just send her a crate full of them and she'll have diabetes and die soon
Ergo - I say waiter, my Chateau Lafite 82 appears to be corked, please bring me another bottle at £1000 a pop and by the way I expect you to bring me another bottle for the rest of my life. I don't care if it is a £1 KitKat or a £1000 bottle of French plonk, the principle remains the same - she is a conniving uppity wretch and if it doesn't all go her way here she is more then welcome to get the first bus to Baghdad and see how she gets on there.
What a lot of angry middle aged white men. Sounds like you're not gonna take it anymore. I suggest you all **** off to yankland and vote for the Donald.
Then that makes her a thieving arab scumbag who doesn't know how to get the best value whilst shopping. If she paid £2 then she is a mug
If you had read the article properly you would have seen that - ‘No one else in that industry has that unique concept about mixing the wafer with the chocolate and that’s why I’m a fan.’ So Aldi can shove their Kut-Kats up their *rseholes. She is just below Pol Pot on the scale of despicable human beings, which way do I throw my eggs?
