Transfer Rumours Wahbi Khazri

Bugger.

 

Shhh...That one was meant for Gordon..

 

Typical. If true another example of Short lacking the balls to keep us up. It's a 6 month loan ffs, not a 5 year contract, give him his ****ing wages and strengthen.

 

Aye, tells you something doesn't it?

 

Aye if true. Hope it not but the way Sam was talking about Yedlin tells me it's probably true

 

For somebody like Ayew maybe mate, not Debuchy though. There's a fairly good chance others in the squad would stop playing if some RB comes in and becomes a top earner.

You have to keep parity where possible unless you get somebody exceptional through the door. He's not.

 

It's a needs must temporary contract. Jones is **** and and Yedlin is even worse. Surely the players aren't that stupid to have their nose put out of joint over that. 90% of the squad are over paid and ****e to boot, who gives a **** what the useless ****s think. The dregs of our squad have been pandered too far too long. **** em, they're ****. Their opinion means squat.

 

But you need them all on side for 4 months now.

Theoretically you're spot on mate, but we all know footballers are big babies who stamp their feet and throw toys around if they don't get their own way.

You know fine well that your players have it in them to have a squad meltdown, Debuchy isn't worth that.

 

Don't know like, that position is so poor mate. It's just not good enough, it's average Championship at best. We can't afford not to strengthen that area, if nobody but Debuchy is available it's a no brainer for me. Not strengthening that position is a far greater gamble imo.

 

If he's in it for the right reasons he'd make that deal happen no matter what. If he goes to villa it's for the money, they're down.

 

I've got no idea, but it would have ruined the post if I'd corrected that bit . . . . pillock

I don't really believe that you didn't understand that, but if you didn't I've really over-estimated you

 

Harsh!

You need to learn to be nice to fellow posters like your good pal Terry.

 

Even when someone tries to be 'clever' in a stupid 'bollocks . . . . I really ****ed that up' sort of way, Terry

 

Now now, I never called you names.

Is it because I did to you what you like to do to everyone else? Patronising everyone on a forum about spelling and grammar, is that as exciting as your life gets?

It's okay mate, we all make mistakes.

 

Don't you mean 'miskates'

p.s. you didn't do what you thought to me, anyway . . . . you might well understand if you read it again (properly)

 

I don't think he's trying to be clever, he just didn't get your subtle and intentional failure to correct one of the errors.

 

Fairy Nuff . . . . benefit of the doubt given

for the harshness, Jack