Off Topic Dark Matter and other Astronomy information.

It's the most ice ever on record after 30 years of man made global warming, you are using language to make it seem irrelevant (yet every drop of melt was relevant) and also you are forgetting we've been told for 3 decades it is melting, you conveniently forget the lies, in your quest to understand something you do not. You never elaborated on your explanations for adjustments to temperatures, I have a few surprises for you. When you're ready.
Spoiler : The have been making adjustments to estimated data, not measured data, and estimating temp for 10 months of the year, when data was there, and all the adjustments were on the estimated data. Massive problem with some of the USHCN data sets

Also if you adjust data by 2 degrees, then scientifically the uncertainty is at least 2 degrees. You know that right?

Someone suggested here yesterday that man made global warming started in the 1700s

So, you were ok with hysteria over every trickle of water but have a problem with someone showing record ice levels. #filterbubble

 

and actually it was my misunderstanding, it's about bio-cultural evolution which is certainly interesting

you'd know that if you read it

 

There was lots of shyte posted on here yesterday, presumably that's why you tried changing tack so that people might forget about your debacle.

 

I actually dont change tack, I narrow the argument down to nuts and bolts, that's when people disappear otherwise they might have to admit something

You are really creepy when you drink lad, last night wtf?

 

more to the point @donga kloppo I confused the sociology thing because sociology is a symptom of bio cultural development.

So apparently you are correct about sociology (I dont know **** about it), but you should have read it if bothering to post, you'd have seen my mistake right off the bat.

 

Sorry, my fault again for not taking into account your mistakes. I should really know better by now.

 

That was as simple mistake, I make mistakes with irrelevant details sometimes, you regurgitate state history from academic hacks paid by the state.

You have ties to military family and such, explains much as to why you defend standard false history.

When you read a lot and dont cut paste others as an argument, you can get stuff wrong if you aint got google open.

Plus you use 1 irrelevant mistake to try take down a whole argument. (George v Prescott) as an example

Case in point because of your ******ism, we are not discussing the article.

 

Narrow it down my arse, you spend most of your time running away from questions you can't answer.

What post did you find creepy, was it the one where I proved you had copied and pasted from a blog as though it was your own writing?

 

You live in some imaginary world, I have spend hours upon hours answering posts on here from 6 different people, on what planet do you live where you can reply to that volume, given the length of some of my replies too, and thought gone into it on this subject..

You with your bile about me and stupid questions about cycles.

I already told you I intentionally ignore you most of the time because our questions are mostly not worth answering. Others post more relevant argument worth answering, if even just to show their delusion.

You spent hours talking about me personally last night and here you are again today, that is an extremely worrying sign for you, not me

 

Sorry did you actually just type the words, "when you read a lot and don't cut and paste as an argument"?



I see your no longer posting about climate change last a long while btw

What a clown

 

You spent an entire day running away from one simple question I asked.

You tell lies and are a complete charlatan.

 

Me and dem facts. Or your lack of them, for that matter. Did someone mention the Duke photograph?

'Military family'. Yeah, my (Commie) dad was a flt sgt in Bomber Command in WWII, and my grandads both served in France in WWI. )WWI was before WWII fyi, just that you get them mixed up with comic regularity, and claiming James II passed laws sixty years before he born). Those there facts again. Never mind Sis, you seem to have found a pastime in climatology denying that suits you and your aversion to 'facts'.

Anyroad, what was it you said about my 'facts'? Ah yes, to paparphrase "You know all the dates, details and facts, Donga, but you don't know the lesson of history". Indeed. Must have been my Prussian military disciplined childhood.

 

So you think you can just run from arguments, let a few posts get made and come back?

More laughy faces and no substance.

Care to explain any of the following that I am still waiting for you to address
Glaciers globally vs Greenland and Antarctica, clarify
Finland's cool summer vs Finland's average temp
Your world hottest year 2014 claim
Why NASA have 1997 as hottest year on the same site they have 2015 as hottest year
The Whitehouse article breakdown.
Record gains in ice at both poles
What you dont get about Loss % of GDP and why it irritates you

or
What makes you sure the science is valid
What do you know about climate models that makes you trust them
Explain how they can model the world in 1900 with no data outside the US.
How they can create a southern hemisphere record for 120 years with no data?
What are the pro's and cons of models
How are forcings applied to models, are they uniform across all models
What can they model and what cant they model
Why did NASA not mention the pacific heat concentration that started in 2013 that affected 2014 and 2015 temps
Why do NOAA adjust estimated data
Why is estimate data used when actual data is available.



Basically all the relevant questions you ignore..

 

Yet more lies about me, isnt that you makung it all personal etc blah blah?

you are the one who copies stuff posts is as your own writing and then runs away from questions because you don't read what you copy.

 

Only back in reality, that list of supposed questions were never asked, you've compiled that list in your own head.

The reality is that you spent an entire day in meltdown running away from answering what caused Finlands temperature in 2014 to be the second highest on record (at that point) if 2015's record Finland annual temperature was solely the result of El Niño?

It's a question that you patently can't find a copy and paste denier site rebuttal of, so you ran round like a nutcase trying to avoid having to give an opinion on it.

 

More nonsene, unspecific and slapstick, bar the family stuff, no disrepsect meant FYI I served two tours and my grandad was in the army and my cousin the military police.
Me and dem facts. Or your lack of them, for that matter. Did someone mention the Duke photograph?

'Military family'. Yeah, my (Commie) dad was a flt sgt in Bomber Command in WWII, and my grandads both served in France in WWI. )WWI was before WWII fyi, just that you get them mixed up with comic regularity, and claiming James II passed laws sixty years before he born). Those there facts again. Never mind Sis, you seem to have found a pastime in climatology denying that suits you and your aversion to 'facts'.

You just use these character attacks, about me, debate fail, I am willing to pay specific attention to your dross today, recite every mistake I ever make, and forget anything I may have been right on, which is the vast majority.. skewed?
If you can see, you use errors I have made to "debunk" future arguments and cast me in a certain light as it were. Surely a guy as smart as ou can break down your own post.

"you use denier" and such showing you are no better than any idiot troll. I still haven't forgotten your idiotic antics on the Gaza thread, it told me something about you, something inherently unpleasant.

Anyroad, what was it you said about my 'facts'? Ah yes, to paparphrase "You know all the dates, details and facts, Dona, but you don't know the lesson of history". Indeed. Must have been my Prussian military disciplined childhood
Yes you know the regurgitated stuff well, because you have google it and any pretense at not doing that is a lie. Take the Bush stuff, from memory and it was about the bush family being dodgy as ****, but I made a mistake and it became about the mistake.. original point conveniently derailed. A common practice from you.

I dont use google when I blather on, so I make mistakes. What is weird is you seem to like collecting them up as use in further arguments, which if I am not mistaken is ludicrous unless one is a bit lacking.

Thing is, your bitter streak that keeps drawing you back to me. Like Tobes and Terrific, you seem to have the same capacity for trying to inflate your own ego, me I an as verbose as ****, I never shut up, ever.

Now cop on, "denier" you call me concerning climate change, yet I have used science and gave you a basic physics lesson, and you know well, literally **** all, and claim I am a "denier" a term used to silence those that said the earth is round.
#irony

 

You are actually terrified of even trying to answer any of those questions, I dare you, one even, you chicken **** #spineless

 

There are three people posting and if I dont reply to every one Terrific will say I am avoiding..

 

Tobes this is about man made climate change.. why are you unwilling to discuss it? If you dont wish to discuss that why bother?

 

Rubbish, why are you afraid to discuss the actual topic, you think the topic is me.

Tell me what makes you believe in man made climate change (that you used to call global warming last year)