So saying a Muslim is not a Muslim because he doesn't follow the right sect is not extreme? Do ISIS not preach the very same stuff that you have filled this thread with? I never said ISIS invented this particularly brand of insanity. I said it's the dogma they follow
problem with your argument is that islam doesnt say do that. Also its about public flaunting that gets homosexuals certain treatment but is it unfair? I would say no. why? because its the same for hetrosexuals for flaunting it publicly. Also islamification doesnt mean taking over for muslims necessarily. A main road near me has 3 mosques and an islamic school (no my kids dont go there) a halal supermarket and halal takeaways etc. Job done no?
In the beginning there was Maltesers and it was all good. Everyone liked a Malteser and got along just fine until someone fancied something crispy on the outside instead of on the inside and lo! The Minstrel was created. Many people who used to eat Maltesers were seduced by the dark side and sampled the forbidden sweetie and found that it too was good. The Maltesers were in uproar, families divided, civil war ensued and the two factions could not see eye to eye. Maltesers were forbidden from consorting with Minstrels, Minstrels set up their own schools and churches and never the twain would meet. I like a Malteser and don't mind the odd Minstrel now and again just don't get me started on the hostile take over by the dreaded M&M's which decimated the Treats!
There is a hadith ( saying of the Prophet) that says that my ummah (people/muslims) will be divided into 73 sects and 72 will be for the hellfire. Point being saying a sect is on the wrong path isnt extreme in Islam as we have basis for it also with Isis or the shia ( who I mainly dont class as a muslim) there are similarities so they pray and I pray. Doesnt mean I am accepting of them
One ****ty street in Stoke is not exactly colonizing the West . You only have about 5% of the population even Paddy power have 3 shops in a run down crappy suburb of Stoke and they would have more if given planning permission so "job done" is not very impressive.
They do get along in certain parts but dont in others due to varying politics (rather than religion) I would say the differences are much bigger too, the catholic protestant example would both be sunni, if you see what i mean?
not just stoke though is it? even southport had a mosque yet I never saw a pakistani there whilst there london, bolton, manchester, birmingham etc
There's a mosque not far from and it was the local Pakistani community that built it. Take it you wouldnt be kissing the carpet in that particular place.