So HIAG, the challenge is simple: Do you stand by your comment that 'Wenger has spent far more than us' on transfers ? And if so, please provide the evidence that you are basing that claim on.
No, it wasn't. You're so fcuked, PIX! Give up, mate. You are now an embarrassment. Notice how no one is supporting you?
It doesn't have to. It demonstrates that their figures aren't accurate, so the whole thing is unreliable.
Nice try HIAG Stan posted the article about the top 10 managers spending on transfers, you responded by trying to wum and said 'Wenger has spent far more than us'. It was clearly linked to transfer spending, that was what the article was about. Do you still stand by that comment ? and if you do please back it up with evidence. Simple.
I've just re-read that, you are agreeing with me and saying it wasn't based on wages You are tying yourself up in knots, because you are trying to argue **** knows what, but actually agreeing with me where I'm proving you wrong. You're still bottling my question HIAG.
HIAG's like one of those zombies from a bad B-movie, you shoot him down, blow out his brains and he still gets up and comes back for more, groaning and babbling incomprehensible **** as he limps forward towards another pummelling.
I have set HIAG a very simple challenge to back up his claim that 'Wenger has spent far more than us' on transfers. He continues to bottle it.
Bottled what, exactly? You've asked me a question that Double-Barrels has "owned" you on several times! That analogy of you being like a monkey, opening masturbating in the corner of your cage at the zoo, is so apt! You've got a crowd of nuns staring at you, looking embarrassed, yet strangely fascinated, and still you keep pumping your fist! It's obscene, but grossly compelling.
The question I have asked you, nobody has 'owned' me on. You claimed that 'Wenger has spent far more than us' on transfers. So do you stand by that comment ? And can you back it up with any evidence ? Your continued bottling is showing you have made yet another wum **** up, unless you can prove otherwise ?
You have also bottled the question about what Spurs have won during the time that they have outspent Wenger. 2 pages of squirming so far. I wonder how much longer you're going to keep it up ?
You've been "owned" on this, PIXIE! Why do you persist? Define "cost" for me. Why won't you answer this question?
**** me you are dense HIAG. I have defined 'cost' it was the same as the cost you were using to base your wum fail on. How many times do you need to be told the same thing ? Now, stop shirking my question. You claimed that 'Wenger has spent far more than us'. So do you stand by that comment ? If you do then provide the evidence on which you are basing that on.
I've already answered this question (which PNP has "owned" you on, several times). You really do need to go and play on the tyres, mate!
No you haven't. The question I have asked you is to whether you stand by your comment that 'Wenger has spent far more than us' on transfers and if you do, to provide your evidence. You have and continue to bottle it.
HIAG, why are you still bottling my question ? Do you stand by your comment 'Wenger has spent far more than us' on transfers ? and what evidence are you basing that on ?
