Lots of numbers on different sites.[barb.co] is just 1,heres another. Yet Leeds’ dominance of the Sky Sports screens is understandable. Of clubs that have spent three or more seasons in the Football League in the period studied, fixtures featuring Leeds have the highest average audience of 477,000 and the 1 I quoted was off sky news the day we played Forest,believe any you want but only the sky sports news one do I give any credence to.
I think I'll take the Broadcasters Audience Research Boards actual figures than any you decide to make up
That's because I support my team,cant see the point in going when you abuse the team and want them to lose.
Cheshire, this is like Groundhog Day, we do under the current contract because we are shown more often. If we want that to change we need to agree that with the other clubs and then go to Sky (or BT) when the new contract is up for grabs.
It is like Groundhog day,you keep saying we are getting lots more money.The crowd was 23,000 yesterday if it was 3pm on Monday like the rest what do you think it would be ? 30,000.Well that's what I think it would have been,so 7,000 x £30 tickets is £210,000 lost so now tell me where all the extra money is coming from.
When Newcastle were in the Championship, they were on live 15 times - sold out every game and had average sky audiences of 522,000 - they are a BIG club
Care to explain more,you saying they had 15 home games televised in one season,sounds like bull **** to me.
http://www.cityam.com/206210/leeds-...-has-had-more-live-games-sky-sports-yorkshire "During their brief sojourn in the Championship in the 2009/2010 season, Newcastle had a whopping 15 live league matches on Sky Sports watched by an average of 522,000 viewers - no other Football League club has been afforded as many in a single season since. West Ham were broadcast live on 10 occasions during their 2011/2012 promotion season.
What in 1 season,10 seasons.If its including away games they didn't sell out did they. please log in to view this image
Please read back. I've never said we're making lots more money. I've said we're getting a lot more of the Sky money because that's what happens when your games get chosen to be shown live. I'm not the one defending the stance about 'disruption' to the fixtures. I think it's only about the money as apparently do you