Vettel and Button for me. Both quick and proven while the choice of Button means there is much lower chance of any friction within the team. In a redbull and you get surefire 1-2s
Thats why i picked kobayashi. Quick, proven driver, who won't cause friction, but also adds excitement, which is good for the team commercially. No offence to JB, he's a top driver, but his smooth style isn't always very interesting to watch.
Button and Rosberg for me. Both quick smooth drivers, and as far as i can tell, not interested in friction.
Well aside from the fact he's my favourite driver I think he's a capable number 2 and would love to see him a race, good tactician and would pick up good points every race. If I wanted the best two, in my opinion, I would have picked Hamilton with Alonso, but we all know how that ended...
Is Kobayashi really proven though? This is only his second full season. he's doing a great job and i really like him (been my second fav driver since brazil 09), but im not sure there is really enough there to qualify him for a drive with the very top teams yet and his qualifying is poor at best. (also i dispute the idea that Jenson is boring but that is another issue) Excitement would come second to results if i was a Team principle.
Exactly the two I'd have picked for my ideal team. It seems there would be a bidding war between team Brush and team Mifune. Seeing as I'm a bit skint, and I wouldn't let some dogshit caffeine drink get a look in I would then choose Di Resta and Kobayashi. I'd set some budget aside for some extra front wings. Boom boom!
It depends on the team, If it was Ferrari I'd have Karthekeyan & D'ambrosio cos they're both **** and I hate Ferrari.
I think a combination of Hammilton, Alonso and Vettle would be the most interesting! I would keep the current combo of Hammilton and Button allowing them to race each other or a Button combo with either Alonso or Vettle!
I was then about to post the same thing. In all seriousness I'd have Vettel and Kubica; my two favourite drivers, both very quick, both very consistent.