Off Topic Dark Matter and other Astronomy information.

another laughable thing is when they are talking on the mic when landing the craft on the moon, there is not one sound or vibration, nothing from firing booster rockets. Nowt Said boosters made no visible impact on the moon surface too, magic.

If someone says "there is no sound in space" I'll piss myself laughing, if you dont understand why I'd piss myself laughing you shouldn't be discussing this subject until you read something.

 

This ^

 

Did you enjoy Question Time last night. I actually thought about you If you've not watched it, don't. You'll put your foot through the box

 

saying this shows how ******ed you are agreeing with that idiot, he likes plausible explanations given to him, because he wants to beleive, he can keep his belief

Who will explain this

please log in to view this image

please log in to view this image

I am sure there is some debunk article donga can find that explains this, boosters can't even disturb lunar dust it seems.

If someone says because there is no air... That is actually why they could not cool the suits, as you can't use convection to irradiate heat, the suits and lem were consistently heating up for 36 hours in 250 degrees.. the batteries in 1960 are far superior to the ones we have today for all that cooling given the Rosetta mission last year, the batteries only lasted a few hours and there were no men on board

You guys are idiots, literally

 

GRAVITY'S RAINBOW THEORY
The Rainbow Gravity theory suggests that gravity's effect on the cosmos causes different wavelengths of light to behave differently.

This means that particles with different energies will move in space-times and gravitational fields differently.

The theory was proposed 10 years ago in an attempt to reconcile difference between the theories of general relativity and quantum mechanics.

One consequence of rainbow gravity is that our universe stretches back into time infinitely with no singular point where it started.



Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencet...ered-incredible-experiment.html#ixzz3u0Gohga2
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

Don't ever call me thick, ****chops.

 

More on X rays, our current tech for focusing x rays uses metal.
High energy electrons, which is what the VA belts are, penetrate the capsule, create x rays as they strike the metal in the capsule, these x rays bounce around inside the metal capsule as that is how we focus x rays.

This is true of using wifi in a metal box, the waves will bounce around inside.

So not only did the craft get bathed in high energy electrons for hours but all of the x rays created would have been bouncing around inside the craft for hours while incrementally increasing in intensity
Tech doesn't mind x rays so much, but the electrons penetrating craft build up electrical charges.

None of these problems were addressed in the apollo missions and all the astronauts and gear were fine, ludicrous. You have to be ****ing stupid to swallow this contracting nonsense. A 60 year more advanced NASA will not send in a manned craft at all because they have no idea

but if you read "plausible explanation" sites no one exlains this without verging on pseudo science and complete garbage


@donga kloppo answer to this question of radiation was "they went there again in the 70s" Cos you know, more lies make the first lie true, Dongalogic

 

@donga kloppo Seeing as I mentioned Rosetta, remember you arrogantly defending dirty snowball comet theory, that Rosetta mission really shot that ****e down quickly

In fact everyone who posted defended dogma despite any evidence to the contrary How oftendo you change your mind ? Not often I bet

please log in to view this image

Not a snowball

 

s'all fine and good selective stuff here i see

1. none can explain how the ISS can function pretty fine or all the ****ty little probes sent off into space... like the japanese peice of crap going around venus currently.

2. watch mythbusters episode sisu. that will explain this stuff to you .. than again any show backed by obama must be in on it i suppose

3. snowball? course not. kids make snow balls. pat them all smooth, unless one assumes jesus made the cments as a kid playing snowball fights with god of course.

Lumps of whatever with water in the form of ice are different and i'm sure jesus was too nice to put rocks in his snowballs but lucifer might have i suppose. i know i did.

 

We've all been called it- don't feel special.

 

That is indeed true

 

Every second at the Large Hadron Collider, enough data is generated to fill more than 1,000 one-terabyte hard drives — more than the information in all the world’s libraries.

please log in to view this image

This data is produced from the most complicated machine ever built on Earth.

 

But does it have any Barbara Cartland?

 

I suspect that's a tad unlikely

Lot of information on fish fingers, though, I believe

 

As usual you spout your theories as being definitive scientific fact, instead of the reality that they're merely the crank extremes used to somehow claim that the moon missions were a figment of NASA's imagination. It's you that's ignorant when it comes to the VA belt. Go and do some further reading on it me old mucker

 

From Professor James Van Allen himself;


Dear Mr. Lambert,

In reply to your e-mail, I send you the following copy of a response that I wrote to another inquiry about 2 months ago --

Ø The radiation belts of the Earth do, indeed, pose important constraints on the safety of human space flight.

Ø The very energetic (tens to hundreds of MeV) protons in the inner radiation belt are the most dangerous and most difficult to shield against. Specifically, prolonged flights (i.e., ones of many months' duration) of humans or other animals in orbits about the Earth must be conducted at altitudes less than about 250 miles in order to avoid significant radiation exposure.

Ø A person in the cabin of a space shuttle in a circular equatorial orbit in the most intense region of the inner radiation belt, at an altitude of about 1000 miles, would be subjected to a fatal dosage of radiation in about one week.

Ø However, the outbound and inbound trajectories of the Apollo spacecraft cut through the outer portions of the inner belt and because of their high speed spent only about 15 minutes in traversing the region and less than 2 hours in traversing the much less penetrating radiation in the outer radiation belt. The resulting radiation exposure for the round trip was less than 1% of a fatal dosage - a very minor risk among the far greater other risks of such flights. I made such estimates in the early 1960s and so informed NASA engineers who were planning the Apollo flights. These estimates are still reliable.


Ø The recent Fox TV show, which I saw, is an ingenious and entertaining assemblage of nonsense. The claim that radiation exposure during the Apollo missions would have been fatal to the astronauts is only one example of such nonsense.

James A. Van Allen

http://cosmoquest.org/forum/archive/index.php/t-3885.html

#yetanotherfail

 

Clearly doesn't know what the **** he's talking about, the thick ****

#deluded

 

Sisu already proved they would be fatal

Sisu 1 Van Allen 0

 

I mean, Van Allen- what would he know about the Van Allen Belt?

 

Patently nothing, he's obviously an ignorant idiot, who swallows NASA's lies.

He needs to spend more time on Google and educate himself about his own discovery.