Does this mean we're better than City as well? On a serious note, City are woeful at the back without Kompany - Demicheles is ****ing awful, wouldn't get a game for us!!
Arnautović is a menacing figure today. Is he always that troublesome? Yedlin seemed to contain him pretty well last week.
City have taken off Silva and Bony. Delph and Navas going in. one other chane I couldn't work out. They look awful (City).
The studio commentator claimed that the "wind at your back" is actually a disadvantage in football. Then the game announcer claimed going against the wind would be a disadvantage for Stoke in the second half. So which one is it?
Thank you for this thread. I started watching the game and saw those two forward back flicks from wingers shielding the ball from pressing defenders, a great skill to use - and be wary of.
He's a bit of a maverick & was pretty anonymous against us. Both goals on a plate from Shaquiri mind you.
Good tidy finishes by Arnautovic but the way Bojan and Shaquiri have influenced this game has been a real pleasure to watch, I've loved it.
Unlike watching United, ba-dum. It's the position in the table that really matters though, just ask Chelsea.
Usually mate. They've been terrible the last few games I've watched. Sterling actually doesn't care about football.
Agreed, signing Sterling was a mistake but for that amount of money was madness. Especially considering their CB problems.
Mangala, Otamendi and Kompany with Demichellis on backup mate Newcastle have CB problems, City are just ****ing lazy.
