Off Topic Dark Matter and other Astronomy information.

Clearest evidence yet that your whole google quest is about boosting your own pathetic ego.

 

What is "Bollocks"?

 

Do you see how sad you are crying about a bit of wum that was ignored by our biggest wum Astro?

You're such a meltdown

 

Once you step outside of relativist logic and examine the light clock, it dissolves on contact with even basic problem solving.

Believe relativity and see everything through that, and as demonstrated by relativists on here, the light clock makes perfect sense, but it's in their heads

 

Something I literally live by

please log in to view this image

 

Not even touching this subject, as my knowledge of physics ended at 'O' level and I hated it way back then.

You can spout what you like on this subject as far as I'm concerned and I'm certainly not the one to challenge your theories

 

NASA southern Hemisphere.

Isn't it damn ****ing convenient that all of the data from ocean and surface temp all needed to be "adjusted" upwards.. to fix it, adusted by people paid to prove global warming. Not odd no.
Same every time, cool the past and warm the present

cold snap in southern hemisphere around 2000, one well known, erased from history.

please log in to view this image

2001 version: FigB.txt
2015 version: Fig.B.txt


This is the guy producing these adjusted temperatures since 2001. #bypoliticalappointment

please log in to view this image

****in ****** mathematicians they have no idea how the real world works. Biggest fraud in scientific history is this lad

 

That is a neat website you put together.

So where did the need to talk about time dilation coMe
From?

 

You going to Boro tonight mate?

 

Of all the bollocks you post on this thread (even though it's not all bollocks), that takes the ****ing biscuit

 

Put himself ahead of Einstein is indeed a beauty

 

What are your views on David Attenborough? Is he a ****ing ******ed **** as well?

 

No.

 

Scientists get first glimpse of black hole eating star, ejecting high-speed flare
Date:
November 27, 2015
Source:
Johns Hopkins University
Summary:
An international team of astrophysicists has for the first time witnessed a star being swallowed by a black hole and ejecting a flare of matter moving at nearly the speed of light.
Share:
2630 0 180 35
Total shares: 5510
FULL STORY

please log in to view this image

This artists impression shows a black hole consuming a star that has been torn apart by the black hole's strong gravity. As a result of this massive "meal" the black hole begins to launch a powerful jet that we can detect with radio telescopes.
Credit: NASA/Goddard Space Flight Center/Swift


An international team of astrophysicists led by a Johns Hopkins University scientist has for the first time witnessed a star being swallowed by a black hole and ejecting a flare of matter moving at nearly the speed of light.

The finding reported in the journal Science tracks the star -- about the size of our sun -- as it shifts from its customary path, slips into the gravitational pull of a supermassive black hole and is sucked in, said Sjoert van Velzen, a Hubble fellow at Johns Hopkins.

"These events are extremely rare," van Velzen said. "It's the first time we see everything from the stellar destruction followed by the launch of a conical outflow, also called a jet, and we watched it unfold over several months."

Black holes are areas of space so dense that irresistible gravitational force stops the escape of matter, gas and even light, rendering them invisible and creating the effect of a void in the fabric of space. Astrophysicists had predicted that when a black hole is force-fed a large amount of gas, in this case a whole star, then a fast-moving jet of plasma -- elementary particles in a magnetic field -- can escape from near the black hole rim, or "event horizon." This study suggests this prediction was correct, the scientists said.

"Previous efforts to find evidence for these jets, including my own, were late to the game," said van Velzen, who led the analysis and coordinated the efforts of 13 other scientists in the United States, the Netherlands, Great Britain and Australia.

Supermassive black holes, the largest of black holes, are believed to exist at the center of most massive galaxies. This particular one lies at the lighter end of the supermassive black hole spectrum, at only about a million times the mass of our sun, but still packing the force to gobble a star.

The first observation of the star being destroyed was made by a team at the Ohio State University, using an optical telescope in Hawaii. That team announced its discovery on Twitter in early December 2014.

After reading about the event, van Velzen contacted an astrophysics team led by Rob Fender at the University of Oxford in Great Britain. That group used radio telescopes to follow up as fast as possible. They were just in time to catch the action.

By the time it was done, the international team had data from satellites and ground-based telescopes that gathered X-ray, radio and optical signals, providing a stunning "multi-wavelength" portrait of this event.

It helped that the galaxy in question is closer to Earth than those studied previously in hopes of tracking a jet emerging after the destruction of a star. This galaxy is about 300 million light years away, while the others were at least three times farther away. One light year is 5.88 trillion miles.

The first step for the international team was to rule out the possibility that the light was from a pre-existing expansive swirling mass called an "accretion disk" that forms when a black hole is sucking in matter from space. That helped to confirm that the sudden increase of light from the galaxy was due to a newly trapped star.

"The destruction of a star by a black hole is beautifully complicated, and far from understood," van Velzen said. "From our observations, we learn the streams of stellar debris can organize and make a jet rather quickly, which is valuable input for constructing a complete theory of these events."

Van Velzen last year completed his doctoral dissertation at Radboud University in the Netherlands, where he studied jets from supermassive black holes. In the last line of the dissertation, he expressed his hope to discover these events within four years. It turned out to take only a few months after the ceremony for his dissertation defense.

Van Velzen and his team were not the only ones to hunt for radio signals from this particular unlucky star. A group at Harvard observed the same source with radio telescopes in New Mexico and announced its results online. Both teams presented results at a workshop in Jerusalem in early November. It was the first time the two competing teams had met face to face.

"The meeting was an intense, yet very productive exchange of ideas about this source," van Velzen said. "We still get along very well; I actually went for a long hike near the Dead Sea with the leader of the competing group."

 

From?[/QUOTE]


that's not my websie, that is a relativity website.

First of all I will point out that if Attenborough is reading the altered data like from above then he would logically "assume" catastrophy is on the way.

I am also surprised that this is your approach to the matter of rewriting historical temperature data to cool the past, it's OK to reference someone along with an actual argument, rather than just saying "he said it". You know that better than anyone I assume.


Look at it this way, say I am trying to sell you shares in my company.
So I show you my stock performance over 100 years. starts out at £20 a share in 1900 and rose to £31 a share by 2000.
You are basing your gamble on the history of the stock performance.

But.. say before we met, I altered my books, changing the 1900 starting share price to £10. That would fraudulently increase the performance trend of the stock over the 100 years. So I would be conning you.

This is exactly what NASA are doing by altering 1880's data to make the warming trend increase between 1880 and 2000.

More warming means much more funding and the money faucet has been left running since the 90s.

Now they want 2% of global GDP A YEAR

 

so what I say may or may not be accurate, but it's bollocks? Can't isolate the last comment without falsifying the argument for posting it.

Who perceives what from where does not change the laws of physics. It creates an illusion that is quantified in mathematics but it is still an illusion, some people get lost and think time dilation is real because it is mathematically derived, and some experimemts that don't actually prove it.

Being able to calculate something does not make that something a physical object or influence. Like a singularity for example, they exist only in mathematics, yet apparently we all spewed from one 13 billion years ago and lets not forget the trillions of singularities in black holes.

Oh and about 78% of matter in the Universe also came from mathematics, not anything else, dark matter.

Thanks to Einstein and his followers most of universe is made up from mathematics, literally

All of them jumping to whatever model suits them mixing them all together (even when they directly contradict each other, Einstein, Newton, Maxwell, Lorentz, Gauss, big bang and black hole universes.

Impenetrable theoretical science salad is the end result.

 

I probably have to add that there was no seriousness in "Einstein 0 1 Sisu" @Red Hadron Collider

It was just some hyperbole.
Unbunch your panties

 

Where is the actual stuff the Astrophysicists saw, why are we looking at an illustration as it is entirely misleading.

I am making a bet that what we are talking about looks nothing like that nice composite image created in the article.

 

It's very pretty

 

Nah. Couldn't make it with babysitting the kids