Off Topic Dark Matter and other Astronomy information.

Maybe Tobes doesn't know, NASA doesn't actually collect measurements of temp from Greenland even though satellites have hundreds of measurements for each month.

Why one might wonder, Greenland Arctic and Ancarctic are ALL estimated temperatures bar a handful of stations

See the grey areas , that is where there are no measurements and it is filled in All the coldest places on earth are not actually part of NOAA's analysis.
Yet Satellites that have thousands of measurement for all those grey areas, are not used?!

please log in to view this image

 

Have already had to repost it for you to prove that you had said that it shows we are in a cycle after you denied that, so please expand and tell us what that cycle is. TBF i added the long term as you have stated in the past it is no use looking at short term weather.

 

What's that got to do with glacial melt?

 

Right lets take it one piece at a time

"You were going on about sea ice expanding, and I pointed out to you that the on land glaciers were still reducing thus adding to the sea volume, which sea ice doesn't affect.

It's a simple known fact, unlike you I didn't need google and some crank websites to post reems of 'data' to back that simple known fact up.

So try explaining it please? In your own time...................."

You do several things here, attack empirical measurement and data from very credible sources to the man made global warming cause, not mine.
So first the crank sites

Data sources
East Anglia Climate research Unit
NASA
NOAA
RSS
UAH
NOAA Radiosonde
Denmark Institute of meteorology.
Cited published papers.
Official government documents
Old newspapers

Now for many charts I just use google image because those data sources are not disputed, like the satellite temps.

My main non science organisation is a blog, Steven goddard hotpress, but all of the charts from there are posted with the links to the data from the actual source, like NOAA or NASA

Can you explain my crank sources?

 

So the glacial melt then?

Care to explain it?

 

bullshit, I never said that, and you know it, find the quote or shut up

 

I will, when I work out what you are on about, cos what you aid in below here is meangingless on its own, obviously cos you cannot put an argument together but I will derf answer that when we clear up wtf you are asking.

But I want you to back up your ****e about ym data and sources
Here is a quote from a famous astronaut "In god we trust, everyone else, bring data"

The very thing you are dismissing because you dont understand it

Right lets take it one piece at a time

"You were going on about sea ice expanding, and I pointed out to you that the on land glaciers were still reducing thus adding to the sea volume, which sea ice doesn't affect.

It's a simple known fact, unlike you I didn't need google and some crank websites to post reems of 'data' to back that simple known fact up.

So try explaining it please? In your own time...................."

You do several things here, attack empirical measurement and data from very credible sources to the man made global warming cause, not mine.
So first the crank sites

Data sources
East Anglia Climate research Unit
NASA
NOAA
RSS
UAH
NOAA Radiosonde
Denmark Institute of meteorology.
Cited published papers.
Official government documents
Old newspapers

Now for many charts I just use google image because those data sources are not disputed, like the satellite temps.

My main non science organisation is a blog, Steven goddard hotpress, but all of the charts from there are posted with the links to the data from the actual source, like NOAA or NASA

Can you explain my crank sources?

explain my crank sources and why they are invalid

 

explain my crank sources, lay it out, explain why data is useless

 

So you are denying saying that it showed we are in a cycle or that there is no point in short term weather data?

 

TT get me the post number of where I said it

 

where you said what?

 

I denied saying the quote you made up, go find it, post number will do, have me in you sig eh, proof of how much I get to you. ******s dont get context

 

what you claim I said ******, amnesia?

 

what quote, you later deny so much of what you have posted I need to make sure I am getting the right one.

 

Nonsense, everything I posted is here on the boards to prove I said it so that makes no sense, where is the post number?

 

this dodging is getting you nowhere (everybody can see what you are doing) what are you denying this time?

 

Now you are speaking for everyone #retard You claimed I said something now prove it. or go away

 

Tobes do you know how many glaciers there are on earth? both temporary and permanent?
http://nsidc.org/data/docs/noaa/g011...ier_inventory/


Your question is ill posed at best.

 

Do you mean your post with:
A) "that chart" showing we are in a cycle
B) denying that you said it shows we are in a cycle
C) saying car emissions contain laughing gas
D) Saying I love america (that was a good one that)

which one?

 

It was a simple question. I'm stating that it's accepted fact that the vast majority of glaciers are reducing.

You're a climate change denier, explain how that works then?