Can't believe City are 6/1 against getting a win. Haven't got the balls to go all out for it though, so I've gone for the double chance of a City win or drawn game @ 7/5 - seems like a decent bet to me. Big bet for me - £20 @ 7/5 before the game started to avoid remote suggesting that I only post about winners and not losers.
I WOULD RATHER PLAY ONE OF THE TELE TUBBIES INSTEAD OF WHITTS.fOR GOD SAKE SELL HIM NOW HE MUST BE WORTH A FEW BOB MAYBE FOREST MAY COME IN FOR HIM.
Bloody predictive text. Why would any striker worth his salt come to us? We create sod all from midfield. On 17 goals this season. Most sides could play us with no keeper. Only Blackburn in top 15 are as poor.
agree. why change a winning formula? Whitts has been a good servant and we shouldn't forget that, but he isn't what we need in a midfield 4. Him on the left and Ralls in the middle would be a better option. We'd be better off with a piggy in the middle. Ours didn't.
Completely. I would say that I'm a big fan of Whitts but he's not the same player he was 3 year ago. We need somebody like Ralls/Mutch to drive our midfield forward. With Whitts we lack that attacking drive. Slade should have realised this last season. Ralls and Gunner seemed to work. Why change?