Off Topic Dark Matter and other Astronomy information.

I never said anything of the sort you pathetic lying ****

I said that NOx creates Oxone in the atmosphere, which it does.

Which makes the second paragraph somewhat ironic

http://www.urban75.org/info/conspiraloons.html

 

"I'm off to have a brew and giggle" others call it running away in the face of disintegrating argument not going for tea.

It's easy proving you are an idiot. Terrific is challenged in some way so I try nto hold it against him.~

"Jesus Christ, you believe his work will be buried in 100 years time, it is still relevant today. Like I said, explain it and we will discuss this Einstein thread a little more "

Based on what I know about theory, new discoveries yes I think that.

What are you basing your opinion on?

 

You never did answer my question about cars emitting laughing gas did you?

 

I said Ozone in the ozone layer is destroyed by NOx, and you went to the internet and google and found a NASA gif showing the composition of Ozone that is NOT the Ozone layer, I had to actually cite the difference and you just ****ed off, #factAccordng to you NOx was important for creaing Ozone

 

I correctly stated that NOx creates Oxone - the end.

 

no cheap escape mate, I was talking about VW destroying the ozone layer, and you all ??? and posted your gif, you disagreed with what I said you lying sack of ****.

Nothing wrong with disagreement, admitting you were wrong is part of it, something you will not do

 

Hence my question about cars emitting laughing gas, that you missed.

 

what are you talking about mad man. laughing gas, whata are you talking about?

 

I asked you a straightforward question and posted a fact, you dope addled mess

 

oh dear, you have no idea do you. Why waste my time with you here.

It's obvious that you don't understand, otherwise you would know how important his work has been and what it has opened up.

Buried in 100 years

 

You posted about VWs etc pumping nitrous oxide into the air.

 

My point was that if you had gone and looked it up instead of the gif, you'd have known that Ozone in the ozone layer is created by energy hitting molecules and doesn't involve NOx at all, so increased NOx going up into the atmosphere will deplete the Ozone because NOx produced Ozone is not the end result, it is part of another reaction that results in no Ozone at all.

So NOx which is god knows how many times worse from planes than cars, is depleting the **** out of the Ozone layer.

since plane traffic is only growing and climate summits see 1700+ private jets travel to them, these ******s are destroying the Ozone to save the world. No tax on jet fuel either.

So air traffic will leave is to get friend eventually unless we have clean planes and no NOx

Already it's 20% more likely today that you will get skin cancer. CO2?

When you breathe out there is 40.000ppm of CO2 in your lungs, and some clima tards say it causes asthma

 

He's a internet professor mate.

He's a mine of fascinating 'facts'. He was telling all about the missiles that were used in the 9/11 attacks on Sunday, the man's the ****ing font of all knowledge

http://www.urban75.org/info/conspiraloons.html

 

Repeating the same **** over and over doesn't change anything
Do you actually have an argument to make here like?

 

More insecure nonsense, just because I actually bother to read stuff, it is a bad thing.

You believe in magic planes that fly through steel walls and leave no holes. That sounds kinda crazy man I am not even dramatising here!

 

He know everything about nothing it seems, and not so much about that!

Going to give him a break, let him recover from being fronted up and him not having the right answers to paste.

He is about three days overdue with a request from triffic.

Wonder if he can give the proof that cold weather and fuel poverty were the killers of old people he claims they are. Can't wait for that data

Or that bio fuel starved 100,000's of people......maybe even 1,000,000's

 

Argument, I thought this was a discussion. Maybe that's the problem you have.


Everyone else is discussing and you are arguing, well trying to argue!


Once you have had a break to recover we can return to this subject of how you think the greatest works of modern physics will be buried And these are subjects you are well read in??

 

You were talking about VW cars and the NOx issue, cars NOx production causes ozone production within the atmosphere which is harmful to human health, it's got **** all to do with ozone depletion in the stratosphere, as its already formed ozone in the earths atmosphere.

#ohdear

#fail

 

Well you keep laughing like it's funny.. slightly disconcerting

You make the claim that in 100 years we will still accept the theoretical aspects of this theories? Or the philisophical aspects of General relativity.. will they apply in 100 years? What about his field equations for creating the unuiverse.. will they still be around? Or Special relativity?

E=MC2 is valid and always will be imo as are many of his other equations but not all of his science will be imo

Wave partical duality also Einstein? Rests on Planck's law, which rests on Kirchoff's law on thermal emissions. recent papers have invalidated Kirchoff's law. Including proving it in the lab, so planck's law could not hold and so..

This is recent, last few years, so in 100 years who knows, I see a lot of new stuff being discovered, and apparently I am nuts for thinking that and it's apparently really funny too.?

 

You read 'stuff' yeah lad primarily utter ****e judging from the reema of absolute bobbins you post on here