Buggery? Conspiracy theory that is. If there was buggery afoot in here Biscan would be all over that ****
Stock market weapons prices of weapons manufacturere soaring after paris attack. Just sayin like. Coincidence of course, these companies dont lobby for war after all.. oh wait. please log in to view this image Already this morning, as Aaron Cantú noticed, the stocks of the leading weapons manufacturers — what is usually referred to as the “defense industry” — have soared: please log in to view this image please log in to view this image please log in to view this image please log in to view this image Also enjoying a fantastic day so far is one of the leading Surveillance State profiteers: please log in to view this image France’s largest arms manufacturer, Thales, is also having an outstanding day, up almost 3 percent, even as the leading French index is down: please log in to view this image Terrorism is really good for some people The private-sector industrial prong of the Military and Surveillance State always wins, but especially when the media’s war juices start flowing.
Lizard....no one gives a **** what your saying. Because you could be right with your observations and that means......no more hating on the average Muslim. Now we don't want that....go and read the script.
No according to a certain utterly ignorant group on here, it's all bullshit and conspiracy theory mate. Some true colous have been shown on this thread, and copious amounts of faux morality and faux logic. Muslims kill French people, Islam is mad mmkay, America France Israel saudis and Britain burn half the world, it was an accident. Carry on. It is, of course, pleasing to view your own tribe as inherently superior. It feels nice to believe that your own side is so intrinsically moral, so Exceptional, that one needs no “evidence” or “investigation” to know immediately that any bad acts are unintended. It is a massive relief to know that things like “war crimes” and intentionally bombing structures protected by the Geneva Conventions can only be done by the countries declared by your government to be adversaries, but never by your own government
I've followed some of the argument on here and wanted to add my thoughts. The Paris attacks have caused a lot of media attention and people have taken to the usual social media to vent and to show support, it's sad that the same attention was not given to the people who were killed in Turkey and it's sad that the usual idiots turned it into an anti Islam campaign one person stood out to me as he posted a comment condeming Islamic leaders for not coming out speaking against IS, they certainly did come out and condemn the attacks but one idiot not bothering to actually check this caused a huge amount on anti Islam comments. People are too quick to wade in without knowing the facts. Some have then highlighted the attacks on Syria and Yemen and highlighting the suffering of those people and the wrongs inflicted upon the region by the Western world, this has to stop, intelligence has to improve. Legitimate targets have to be identified correctly and the attack has to be accurate, in any war there are casualties (not that I accept this) but imo not enough is done to keep them to a minimum. My main point is that regardless of what is happening in Yemen and Syria, the slaughter of innocent people in the name of IS is an outrage that cannot be left unanswered, the intelligence services need to up their game and halt this organisation, they wont stop them I don't think you ever can but at this point they need curbing as they are finding it too easy to carry out their operations. I ended up in a Turkish Restaurant on Saturday night quite late and it was really quiet in there the owners brought up the attacks and were at the point of deperately trying to distance themselves from any kind of hatred or and dislike for the country they now lived in, I found it really sad. They are nice people who bring a lot to our community and are more welcome than the bigoted idiots I occasionally endure on moronic websites like Facebook.
I don't mind the silly arguments I like to waffle But agree with all sentiment here. I just want all victims of all nations to have the same victim value to the media, I am sick of the twisted western amnesia and faux morality, it makes me want to puke. I am like I am because the government and media provide one narrative with a narrow spectrum within where limited debate is allowed, that is how you control people and society.
Surely if you are trying to debunk something or say its wrong, or spreads violence then you have to know about the source not just snippets of information from the media? To come to conclusion of Islam being spread through violence surely you have to know the subject matter? The prophet Muhammed (pbuh) was expelled from Makkah for his belief, he didn't return till towards the end of his life, there was a peace treaty between the early Muslims and the Makkan's of the time, the treaty was broken and the Muslims took back Makkah without violence actually. Briefly what some of the Non-Muslims say about Muhammed (pbuh): Gandhi: I became more than ever convinced that it was not the sword that won a place for Islam in those days in the scheme of life. It was the rigid simplicity, the utter self-effacement of the prophet, the scrupulous regard for his pledges, his intense devotion to his friends and followers, his intrepidity, his fearlessness, his absolute trust in God and his own mission. These, and not the sword carried everything before them and surmounted every trouble." YOUNG INDIA, 1924 Lamartine: Histoire de la turquie, 1854 "If greatness of purpose, smallness of means, and astounding results are the three criteria of human genius, who could dare to compare any great man in modern history with Muhammad? The most famous men created arms, laws and empires only. They founded, if anything at all, no more than material powers which often crumbled away before their eyes. This man moved not only armies, legislations, empires, peoples and dynasties, but millions of men in one-third of the then inhabited world; and more than that, he moved the altars, the gods, the religions, the ideas, the beliefs and souls... the forbearance in victory, his ambition, which was entirely devoted to one idea and in no manner striving for an empire; his endless prayers, his mystic conversations with God, his death and his triumph after death; all these attest not to an imposture but to a firm conviction which gave him the power to restore a dogma. This dogma was twofold, the unit of God and the immateriality of God; the former telling what God is, the latter telling what God is not; the one overthrowing false gods with the sword, the other starting an idea with words. "Philosopher, orator, apostle, legislator, warrior, conqueror of ideas, restorer of rational dogmas, of a cult without images; the founder of twenty terrestrial empires and of one spiritual empire, that is Muhammad. As regards all standards by which human greatness may be measured, we may well ask, is there any man greater than he?
"I don't see much difference between you and them apart from one of you act on your hatred, the other are a set of keyboard warriors." ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ A comment on our board from @Spurlock make of it you will. I think it's clear as day personally. The guy came on our board and cowardly had a lot to say but wouldn't have the courage to point the finger or answer when challenged. He has the biggest chip on his shoulder known to mankind
Maybe that chip on his shoulder is there because the things taken for granted in this country(UK)doesn't apply to Spurlock or other decent followers of the Muslim faith, because of the murderous actions of Islamic fundamentalists all Muslims are looked at suspiciously by the now frightened people of our inner cities. Cause for Spurlock to be pissed of with how society views him just because of his faith? Yes.
Should have read the thread. Spurlocks the one calling drinkers equal to terrorists and British women sluts.
That is one big fat ****ing NO from me. The truth and reality is we are being attacked by terrorists, who are Muslim. It is natural that people are going to be scared and suspicious, doesn't have to be took to a level where people are infatuated and it consumes their lives. However, there's Muslims out there who are attacking this country people are going to be on the back foot. Why do you and Spurlock talk like it's 'society' who has negative views on Muslims? When the reality is it's a very small minority, you know, like the terrorists killing in the name of Muslims that offends me...
It's there for all to see..I read page upon page of bile on your website. It was a free for all..no one was being pulled up for the many prejudice remarks such as to paraphrase..'some woman was on tv with a bin bag on her head' If I had spouted crap on the same level..first...id be vilified and accused of plenty....and when I have spouted things...I'm pulled up..it's a great social experiment this is. That is just one example of many...I had to point out your subtle prejudices and obvious hatred...and then I said I'm done with it...because this exhausting....and the results are largely disappointing.
No I didn't..I was giving you like for like prejudices as examples. my wife is a white Brit you ignorant fool..it's a point I have made. But you have your agenda.
You think you live in a controlled society?? Man, you don't know how lucky you are to live in one of the most comparatively free societies in the world. Just think, and count how many societies around the world where we couldn't, or woulldn't dare to be even having this debate for fear of our lives!
Course pal. Nobodies buying it. You name my agenda, I have a pretty good idea what yours is mind. Your posts are a massive give away.
Yes..to be left to live my life and not be associAted with ISIS..and to defend myself from the mud slinging. In the meantime to carry on exhistence in my country...abiding by the laws of the land...that's not enough though.
