None of those planes can fly at 500 knotts, yet that is what the flight data says. Either the planes were not those claimed or the data is wrong, except two different data radar and flight recorded data both match speeds, so, rule out the data being wrong, what does that imply?
Think he wanted to focus on one element for this article. He's done plenty on the role of western powers in the ME etc before.
FFS! Now we'll get 83 pages of cut-and-paste, photoshopped nonsense telling us how a 737 (that wasn;t even involved in 911) couldn't have left that imprint (but no mention of how the the missile in the same shape of a 737 that wasn't even involved in 911 could have).
They can, you're wrong. If you'd have bothered your arse to read the link I posted when you raised that incorrect point earlier, you'd no longer be spouting that line.
Anyway, as sisu promised. He will now drop it as a plausible explanation has been given. He's a man of his word, I have little doubt
I like and respect John Snow's objectivity but he's confused and off the mark here. It also doesnt factor in the west's involvement which seems surprising considering the attack was in Paris and not Tehran or Jeddah.
Your cynicism is well placed. I'm out of here to avoid the same cut-and-paste avalance I've seen so, so many times before. By y'all. Je suis Parisienne.
Also your bullet analogy is not quite right. You can take an aluminum shell and load it into a tank and it will turn to dust on impact and do no damage, you would have to send that shell at quite a few times the speed of sound before you could to even hope to do any sort of damage, WTC's outer steel was two layers of tank armour of say a T34. For the wings to penetrate that steel and its a ****ing fact, they would have to have been travelling at mach 8 or something, simply because the structural connections of the wings to the fuselage could not possibly have the strength to hold those wings on to cut through that steel. The main fuselage should punch through like a pencil in mesh, that is how that building was designed, to take multiple strikes. Lets forget for one minute two sets of data prove that the "plane" flew at 500 knotts, but lets forget that inconvenience, the plane would have needed to travel at about mach 4 or more for the velocity to allow the wings to cut the steel before the structural integrity of the plane gave way and the wings snapped off or folded back. Remember it is claimed that an entire plane went into a tiny missile sized hole at the pentagon, and the wings are said to have "folded back" there. But the laws of physics change when it's the WTC. Any objective critical examination of this whole thing makes it fall apart, such horseshit. Physically impossibly, and when there is actual video evidence from the sources we all love.. silence
What pisses me off is why are media channels, like Instagram, not doing more to stop these loonies from trying to spread their hatred?..
Drug induced conspiracy theories don't quite have that same sense of excitement and anticipation, do they?
I will pay good money for someone to direct me to a half decent discussion about football... anywhere. I cant take this thread anymore
Must be a fake that fella, as that's ISIS inviting people to join Islam the only true religion..... But they're nothing to do with Islam, you're a bigot if you even suggest it....
Leave drugs out of this! They're getting a bad rep in all this lol. The rest yes. This debate has died a slow and lingering death. It's so bad it's like watching Van Gaal's football (sorry UIR )
