No you said how is that possibe as he was serving in the pacific. If you can back that up with a post number I can read I'll happily retract that statement. You were questioning the probability of my claim that Bush did the legwork for dad Prescott. Saying he was in the war was irrelevant, he WAS with the family WHEN Nixon was recruited. According to Nixon's biography, he was recruited in 46, George Bush was homourable discharged in Spetember 1945. Recruited, not turned into anything instantly, Bush could easily have had a part in it as not, but you used that to "disprove" the whole debate on the Bush family, like I said you use miner errors to try pull the whole thing down, in this case, it was prescott who recruited him, but it was irrelevant in terms of the point I was making about what the Bush family have managed to pull off over the years. That was lost in your irrelevant point about HW Bush, but I did accept you were correct about prescott at that time calling the shots. That's the thing with you in your little list of things, plane model wrong, Monarch name, and my brainfart of placing Luistainia in WWII, even I thought what the **** when you pointed that out Those are details in a wider debate, none of which actually changed the main premise, yet you use these to pull down a whole argument cos once you see a mistake you go off on one of your arrogant slating games, rational debate ends at that point. same **** over and over, I don't even be talking to you and you come at me like this muppet, but that's easy on a forum aint it me little coward. Let me give you an example of your troll logic. Claim, A man stole a red brick, Donga logic dictates that if the brick was blue then no crime was committed There was not hundreds of news agencies liar, there was 5. All the footage was shot by 5 networks. All of the witnesses that claimed on that moring to see AA planes were employees or relatives of employees of those networks. You still have not answered a basic physics question, how does this leave no hole. This is what you saw on BBC that day. There is no ****ing way that happens. End of please log in to view this image
Thats twice you posted that link, is there something on it you want to share? if so post it. I'm not launching the link
I've actually posted it about half a dozen times and will continue doing so every time I come across your latest crackpot nonsense Try reading it
Tobes as usual when left with nowhere to run qwont answer a simple question. how does a tinfoil plane pass through a fortress of a building intact and leave no hole. That's all I want to know, even a remotely plausible explanation will do.
Is this the basis of your, let's be honest, mad as a bicycle theory? Tens of thousands of people were clearly in on the conspiracy because you can't see what you consider to be acceptable damage to the building in that photo? Cast iron case you've got there fella!
really, fancy that, a link speaks for you, surely you an make an argument with the contents of your backup, which does prove what I say about you, a 3 minute expert, doesn't know ****, comes back with links, magic. So what exactly in that link explains the plane magic, post it if you have it nailed.
Nowhere to run? And here's me thinking that it was you that was the one posing the batshit mental conspiracies... You're ****ing hilarious
that is the south tower entry point, you don't even know what you are posting, you are doing a Bodanki.
Did you read the one I posted earlier that floors your previous incorrect assertion about the plane speed btw?
