I remember seeing some Louis Theroux thing in America once, about race groups there. They did the usual KKK, white-supremacist nutters, but they also showed this black group whose leader was convinced that Sir Tom was black by virtue of the fact that no white man could sing that good (and he was serious). Then again, he reckoned Elizabeth I was black as he had an etching of her that was a bit like a reverse-negative photo. Otis really rated him too. Could there be any higher, cooler praise?
Some Sick ****s about man.... http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...zing-playground-named-little-girls-honor.html Telling a grieving mother her daughter never existed and then vandalising a playground built in her honour.....lovely man! The **** is wrong with people!
There are some ****ed up people out there man, most of em are in positions of power, thankfully ^^ that **** never got anywhere in life to cause widespread damage.
1 in 20 whites in the Southern States have at least 1% African DNA. (some a lot more than that) It is estimated that 98% of all people on earth have ancestors of "different races" if you go back 17 generations. Travel wasn't as common in earlier generations but still happened. A "pure race" doesn't exist and never has.
Not sure about that. These guys seem to have stuck to one familial gene, maybe a little too adherently: please log in to view this image
That's kinda my point. You pick up on any conspiracy that makes the UK/US look bad (or related orgs like NATO etc). Believe whatever facts some wacko conspiracist says without doing any critical thought... Whilst immediately dismissing all main stream outlets like the beeb (or in this case every single US network) as unreliable. There are millions of people who live in New York. Are they all being paid off by the US government to say 9/11 happened when it didn't? Not to mention the hundreds of tourists who would have been in lower Manhattan/tribeca/battery park area. Did the US government buy them off too. Same with your Aer Lingus conspiracy. If it were really British military shooting the plane down the Irish government would be livid... Not telling everyone the British didn't do it. A little common sense should tell you these wacko conspiracy theories are meritless. But you believe them (or at least report them) with religious zeal just because it backs your anti UK/US stance without thinking. No. I'm not going to waste all day investigating the aer Lingus conspiracy because 5 mins tells me it is ludicrous.
Do yourself a favour and don't get in to this with him. I gave up a while ago. I will admit that some of his thoughts on Climate change had some merit and I have researched more into things he said and its not all easily explained, but its a complicated matter and one thats baffled people much more intelligent than will ever grace these forums. However, the 9/11, Sandy Hook bullshit et all........totally ****ing wackadoo.....don't even get into it with him.
That's why I normally only say one or two posts and then drop it. It's not normally worth arguing with either ideologues or religious zealots because they only believe what they want to believe and ignore reason. His climate change stuff is all deliberately deceptive like his chart (showing sea level going up but he streches the y axis to include Gore's prediction to make the curve look flatter)... Or refering to regional occurances like sea ice increasing (globally temperatures have gone up though). Also the sea ice and snowfalls are impacted by warming air. The polar regions are pretty much cold deserts it almost never rains or shows there because it is too cold. Arctic and Antarctic have more percipitation as a result of warming air... Water falling on land that gets below freezing = more ice. So don't read too much into his climate change denial. There's actually reasonable more plausible explanation for the parts that arnt just conspiracy nonsense.
I have a 4 year old daughter tho man, I cannot imagine her getting shot and killed at School and a slew of ****ing idiots denying her existence and vandalising memorials to her etc. Cannot even begin to imagine the grief the parents must be going through, and we get morons denying it happened. I don't think I would be able to contain myself if I had been that girls father, he would be 6 feet under and i'd no doubt be in jail.
I'm with you on this. I'll happily admit (my Mrs knows it too well), if anyone did anything deliberate to my children in a way that is evil to the core I would torture them and kill them, and happily find peace in a jail cell for the rest of my days. That's the gods honest truth *better add 'allegedly' due to yesterdays hotshot laywer debate!
Oscar Pistorius lawyer recorded saying: 'I am going to lose' Unclear what Barry Roux was referring to in comments made after appeal hearing where prosecutors called for murder conviction According to reports, Roux was overheard saying in Afrikaans: ‘But that I am going to lose is a fact.’ Photograph: Rex Shutterstock Simon Allison in Bloemfontein Tuesday 3 November 2015 13.26 GMT Last modified on Tuesday 3 November 2015 14.18 GMT Oscar Pistorius’s defence lawyer has been inadvertently recorded telling his opposite number “I am going to lose” after prosecutors at an appeal hearing called for the athlete to be convicted of murder for shooting his girlfriend, Reeva Steenkamp. The context of the quotes or whether Barry Roux was referring to a point of law, the appeal as a whole or an unrelated matter was not immediately clear. The South African news site News24 said the exchange happened after the court adjourned when microphones in place for broadcasters recorded Roux telling the state prosecutor, Gerrie Nel, in Afrikaans: “But that I am going to lose is a fact.” Pistorius was convicted of culpable homicide last year and freed on parole to house arrest last month. If the appeal is successful, Pistorius will probably return to prison. Arguments at the Bloemfontein appeal court centred on whether Pistorius had the intention necessary for a murder conviction and, if the court does find against the athlete, whether it can impose a new conviction or must order a retrial. please log in to view this image Facebook Twitter Pinterest Oscar Pistorius at a bail hearing in 2013. Prosecutors have called for him to be convicted of murder for shooting his girlfriend Reeva Steenkamp. Photograph: Themba Hadebe/AP Neither prosecution nor defence are keen on a lengthy and expensive retrial. Nel was highly critical of the original trial judge, Thokozile Masipa. “The court ignored the most important circumstantial evidence,” he said, contending that this failure led to Masipa misconstruing Pistorius’s actions on the night in question. Nel also argued that Masipa was inconsistent in relying on Pistorius’s evidence when she had already dismissed him as an unreliable witness. Roux tried to argue that these issues were questions of fact, rather than law, and therefore not grounds for an appeal. The judges interrupted him frequently: they were more interested in his interpretation of the concept of dolus eventualis – in this case the argument over whether Pistorius foresaw the possibility that he might kill someone when he shot four bullets into a tiny bathroom. “Did he believe he was entitled to shoot in those circumstances?” asked Justice Eric Leach repeatedly, referring to the tiny dimensions of the bathroom in which Steenkamp died. “There was no place to hide.” Oscar Pistorius appeal judge: Reeva Steenkamp had nowhere to hide Roux told the court the question could not be separated from Pistorius’s mental state and his physical condition as a double leg amputee. “Bang bang bang bang. [Pistorius] fired shots in quick succession. He should have thought better. He should not have fired four shots. He should not have fired shots at all. But that does not explain what his mind is saying … Something must have happened in that man’s mind that forced him to fire and explains that … It’s unfair to see this through the prism of someone standing there with two legs,” he said in his closing statement. http://www.theguardian.com/world/20...er-barry-roux-i-am-going-to-lose?CMP=ema_565a
The 9\11 is nothing, your historical knowledge of the world is tragically lacking so you see the world differently. When I grow up in western society hearing how moral and good we are and how bad the rest of the world is, then learn we are worse (governments) then yeah I am gonna ppint out the hypocracy. This is my part of the world remember, I know little about quite a few countries I never talk about. Your default position is a ludicrous propaganda stance of Russia is bad Iran is bad we are good. You do the exact same thing I do, except you talk about a country you know nothing about, Russia. I know the history of the western nations very well indeed and they have caused more suffering around the world than any other nations on earth in the past several hundred years. I point out all of the atrocities of the western saint nations because the media and academia will not do it, outlook s like yours are a result of that whitewash of real history. We have yards of Russia is bad stuff but no honesty about our own governments. Now tell me who iran has attacked in last few hundred years? Tell me the countries Russia has invaded and occupied and still occupies? Tell me how many Russian bases are outside Russia? "oh Russia kills people" whilst Milk forgets Obama is murdering children with Drones and American citizens without evidence trial conviction. Remind me how many official Russian assassination programs run around the world, As we speak Obama is building Drone bases secretly in Africa. The UK has an official assassination program too, again no trial, no need to provide evidence. Give me a ****ing break Have you ever even heard of the Safari club?
To use a simple analogy, when my son comes telling me anothe kid did this and that.. the first question I ask him is "and what did you do?" The same applies to examining claims of our governments. We still support regimes far worse than Iran or Russia, like the Saudis. Yet still claim we are "better than them".
Well personally I dont claim anyone is better than anyone, I just call BS for what it is when I see it. What the **** has Milks knowledge of Russia got to do with his thought on 9/11? Did he even mention Russia?
I actually agree with the vast majority of that. But as Bodanki said - I'm not sure the need for this outcry simply due to Milk not going with a theory that you support
