most often, people who lose an arguments, tend to play the Police grammar card instead tbh it is quite disturbing when people focus on grammar mistakes when there are people saying Kazan had actually paid the ref and there was some cash exchange !!? or may be the fact that most of Liverpool fans are now just a bunch of delusional people that you find such comments just normal to focus instead on grammar? that is a worrying sign tbh
No need for a 4page dossier mate, clearly you have no clue what your talking about, you even said yourself you did not watch the game so as I said your opinion is null and void. 2 clear pens not given, cost us the result we rightly deserved. Your outrage is amusing though haha
Not that I care much either way, but my general feeling is anyone using pens not given to justify not winning a game, is looking for excuses. Not just Liverpool, anyone. Same applies to red cards not given, fouls not given etc. At the end of the day, Liverpool simply weren't good enough to score against a 10 man side. You deserved exactly what you got.
Well if the ref was clearly bought by the Russian mafia and you drew a game you should have won you would think it worth mentioning no? 2 clear pens not given and the goal disallowed sums up how corrupt football really is. Sad times really.
No chief, he committed two yellow card offences and was then correctly sent off. Dunno why you doubt it to be honest, just look at the blatter and platini thing. Anyone who w Watched the game could see the ref was bought.
I didn't watch it. It just sounds like straw clutching. You were at home against ten men and should have been able to score from open play in order to win.
Nah, after they had a man sent off it was 10 men in their own box, not as easy to score against a team who have 10 defenders camped in the box. Honestly guys do you even watch football?
You didn't watch the game and you try not to watch Liverpool.... Yet you have an opinion on a game you never watched regarding a team you try to avoid watching. I rest my case.
Now you're dwelving into the realms of make believe. I thought you were being genuine about deserving the win, but when you start talking about refs being bought off, then any credibility is lost. It was a poor Russian side languishing 12th in a poor league of 16 teams. I could understand the argument "poor day at the office" for Liverpool. It happens. But to say you deserved anything more than a goalless draw is as extreme as Shwan's ramblings tbh.
What case? I asked a simple question, was the sending off part of the refs corruption. And if you played so well you 'deserved' to win, surely you should score against ten men at home. Liverpool are ****e, why would I watch that dross?
I'm new, used to be kops'n'rodgers. I answered your simple question. And I explained my reasons for not being able to score against a team down to ten men. I can't seem to understand why you would comment on a game you didn't watch with a team you avoid watching whom also, in your "educated" opinion are dross? I watch most games if I can, even long ball utd games.
I didn't offer a single opinion on the game, I merely asked you a couple of questions. Not sure what bit of that you don't get.
You asked me a question, normally that results in a reply to said question, which I did. Twice. I think that's what your missing lol
