I'm literally stirring with my wooden spoon here mate But in all seriousness there is a legal case to uncover the truth of that as we speak, which imo supercedes any blog you or I may post. There is no reason why someone should have to sue to get that info.. about the school Hi My name is Robbie, my 6 year old daughter was slaughtered the day before. Sorry mate dont buy it, ever please log in to view this image It's called a dupe smile, an involuntary thing humans do when they know they are lying and know they will get away with it
He will still deny it happened. Sisu please advise which of the following you believe are true and which are fake 1. WW1 2.WW2 3.The holocaust 4.My Lai massacre 5.Kennedy shooting 6. Moon landings 7.Prince Philip and the Queen murdered several native Canadian Indians whilst on a royal visit to Canada (one you put on this forum some time ago) 8. Father Xmas 9. The Easter Bunny 10. Ghosts 11. LFC winning the Champions League after being 3 -0 down at half time in the final.
That's a snapshot of a nervous laugh when dealing with the press, having googled this now (thanks for that!) I've found sites with psychologists etc saying it was a normal nervous reaction and that grieving people don't just stay deeply sad 100% of the time, other emotions creep in and often when you lose someone people will think of the good things about that person to try and make themself feel better and more able to cope and in such a situation a small smile might appear on someone's face. A snapshot of someone smiling a couple of days after there child died doesn't prove the child didn't die lol
there is just no need for your ridiculous attitude, what sort of lunatic would think no.11 could ever happen!
I was trying to trick him, because I know Father Xmas exists. I met him in John Lewis' grotto when I was 5 and he gave me a plastic cowboy pistol and a sheriff's badge, if that is not rock solid evidence I don't know what is. Also this was before the internet so it must be true!
got to say its far better evidence than sisu usually provides. Anyway, you must have been posher than us as we only went to see father christmas in TJ's.
My Nan and Grandad used to take us, it was our big treat at the time as my Dad was in hospital for over 2 yrs and money was tight. I can remember being really disappointed one year that the grotto was not there and instead you could have your photo taken with one of the violent monkeys they had hired. The monkeys lasted about a week as so many kids were bitten or scratched, they were bloody terrifying. It would never be allowed today due to animal cruelty laws and H & S, and quite right to. My kids pissed themselves laughing when my Mum showed them the photos as me and my sister are clearly crapping ourselves holding monkeys that were nearly the same size as us. I can remember the handler saying they liked us as they were smiling, I now know that a smiling monkey is very upset and about to attack thanks to David Attenborough.
I was just providng some distraction for Bodanki from Chelsea's relegation battle and afctw's imminent loss to United tomorrow
You've left the Paul McCartney/Billy Shears conspiracy out of that one. Evidence: Paul McCartney was known to be a B/S as a boy. Those of us who met him in the 70's and 80's can confirm that he tried to avoid any conversation about the game and didn't appear to know one end of a football from another. Conclusion: the real Paul McCartney was indeed 'buried' by John, as apparently said by John at the end of Straberry Fields (the bit that sounds like 'Cranberry Sauce!" to unbelievers)., and Billy Shears knows **** all about football and has had to be coached in the subject over the last 40 years to reach the basic, entry-level of the B/S - i.e. remember by rote every bad decision since Clive Thomas, and forget every dodgy one that went their way, like the Pienaar non-sending off, the Suarez disallowed goal, etc, etc, etc. Other conclusion: Paul McCartney doesn't know that much about football at the best of times, and certainly didn't want to talk about Everton in the 70's and early 80's. This is the version foistered onto the unwitting public by the CIA, MI5 and the Royal Family (when they're not shagging infants).
You actually cannot guarantee me anything. You know it. I know it. Can you refer me to the sort of relevant stuff you read on this, surely this is not all pulled form your arse in reaction to reading my post? As usual? "these nuts" also denotes your pretty narrow view on this subject. ignorance. Then of course avoid the mental health issue, it's not cultural you dope (cultural to slaughter children with guns in schools?), reading you say that just tells me you are weighing into waters without wellies pal. What aspect of Amrican culture makes them go nuts and go on shooting rampages? 500 people + were murdered in the UK last year, only about 5 of them with guns. This suggests you are talking out yer backside, but I can't "guarantee" that tho
It just goes to show.. I talked about the actual causes of people going into meltdown and why they choose to take many down with them and why is it america. I get nothing.. But if I talk about stupid conspiracy theories I get many replies, a stupid game where no one can prove anything like.. Real worthy subject = no interest/ Stupid conspiracy bait = much interest. That says plenty about you guys, the conspiracy crap is what gets you going, intelligent thoughtful reasonable debate, nope. Terrifictroare though, serious loner with mental issues. Broken people are not hard to spot. While I do like my conspiracy theory, I don't like obsessing with certain people as it is quite unhealthy. Questioning things is part of trial and error. That is why there is nothing wrong with conspiracy theory. If it doesn't pan out then that is progress. Something ruled out. Not questioning anything is idiotic, and it seems to be the mainstream approach. Hey @terrifictroare at what point did you become obsessed with me? Why do you run away when i prove you wrong only to appear a week later with more requests for proof of minor comments here and there, expecting me to go searching the internet every time you ask me something? That's how mentally damaged you are that you think I care if you, some mental case, doesn't believe me. But I really know you are obsessed because of a certain mullering you got and cried over in my electrion thread
TT talking about "ridiculous attitudes" is more than slightly hypocritical The **** is bitter cos of his bed sores, the **** has a monitor tan, weird loner loser
I'd imagine Bodanki is making a pretty easy to make assumption that less guns = less gun crime. I'm pretty sure you can find plenty of stats to back that up. Surely that's just logical thinking? And when he suggests it's also a cultural problem I'd imagine he means the paranoia of the country, the cultural attitude towards guns and protecting themselves etc... As opposed to it being part of there culture to kill kids. Think you may have misread his intentions in his post and slightly gone off on one there mate.
