So you are playing the "prove it game" How come only I have to provide solid proof for everything opinion I have and you don't? Your opinion is all you need as evidence but I need pictures of Cameron sniffing baker and even then you'd claim they were photoshopped and not proof
Sorry mate, at least I supported my opinion, where as you are just blathering on. Can you provide any "proof" my opinion is incorrect.?
The thing about talking to you is you say things I did not say. You are essentially using a laughey to laugh at something no one said, which makes you look a bit mad in the head. I said bankers and high society are hitting the coke and always have done, it's no secret. It's just that I am saying it and you get on your ******ed troll cape. You do know the drug trade is not run by gangsters right? Who do you think has been running the opium trade throughout England's history ffs. Read a history book ffs. The "lords" of the land ran the opium trade since forever and that has not changed. They don't take a personal hand in the running of the trade. You've no idea what the trade is worth. Who do you think is flogging all of the opium from Afghanistan ffs It's only the world's biggest supplier, and that return to global supplier happened under US occupation The Taliban had destroyed the crops prior to the invasion. Those are facts lad.
I don't have to, you're the one making blanket statements about the entire Govt's penchant for the Bolivian marching powder, therefore the burden of proof lies with you. I can merely state that you've made a lazy and inaccurate assumption based largely on some story about Camerons youth. What you've provided has **** all to do with the current front benches. I'm no lover of Cameron and the Tories, but I hate this kind of lazy generalisation. You've got or have provided **** all to back up your comment, until you do so I'm simply going to label it as libellous bullshit.
No when we have different opinions and you say mine is wrong you need to support that argument mate. I gave an "opinion" about Cameron, but what I said about coke in those circles is fact no opinion. The evidence is all over the internought ffs, just google UK politicians and coke, bankers and coke actors and coke rich people and coke. It's literally common knowledge like you dope I've worked in corporate, including City of London for a bit, and the things I seen.. from molestation, drug taking and all manner of wtf going on at corporate shindigs. A completely different world to the one I lived in. The life we live is a far cry from those in the money circles. I know for a fact that Reinsurance\finance is riddled with coke munchers.
The comment about HSBC was completely irrelevant to the conversation, you were just eager to launch off on a tangent and mount another of your favourite boring hobby horses. Your obvious hatred of anything relating to the British Govt / establishment has become ****ing tiresome 'lad'.
So I have first hand experience of what goes Now the HSBC thing is to show that the "morals" you try attach to these people is a fallacy. It's to show that even in business the banks are assocated with the drug industry, who do you think has been laundering drug and weapons for the last century? This was what HSBC got caught doing, not everything they have done. Ove the years I have read many different sources from authors to reports to investigative journalism and to people who have been in those circles. That's where the opinion comes from, so in that context it is an educated one. Where you "just have an opinion" and that for you is enough, totally unsupported as usual
Now go and find something to back yer cack or don't. No one said EVERY single banker and politician are taking baker, you as trolls do, make false absolutes and attack them. Your usual tactic. You love a good straw man
Charlie exists and is common amongst the elite......no **** Sherlock It's also common amongst the rank and file, the stuff is literally everywhere these days you dope. However, just because some of whatever profession choose to partake, doesn't equate to them ALL being coke heads. You spouting off like a Red top headline writer ffs.
Go into most pubs in London on a weekend and you'll find someone sniffing gear in the toilets. Doesn't have to be a pub full of MPs or Bankers that's for sure.
Oh here he goes "I've read up on it" and therefore your opinion is worth ****, as I'm a ****ing expert. Change the record you boring ****
"And Cameron putting his cock into the mouth of a pig's head" So did Corbyn - she's called Diane Abbot. At least Cameron didn't send the pig around to his house to tell his wife to get out of town.
I think that probably depends on the type of drug, the geographical location and what level of the drugs trade we are talking. There are most definitely plenty of gangsters making a lot of money in the drugs trade who do not answer to the government.
All the bankers and the likes of Osborne and cameron are whacking the baker.. these coke heads are running the country ffs, no wonder things are a shambles. So the PM is a coke head. Fancy that Those will be your words right there, ALL bankers and Cameron et al are on beak - in the present. Proof = zero Facts = zero Libellous bullshit = FACKHT
"Libellous bullshit" I love this, as if it is some deep concern for law and slating Cameron, faux legal morality "All the bankers and the likes of Osborne and cameron are whacking the baker" colloquial "all" doesn't actually mean all as in every single one, that is common sense like, but you need absolutes so you can go off on one. I am not in a court room here after all. Again, you turn everything into absolutes.
You are "actually" offended on behalf of Cameron. Faux morals, faux rage. Are we gonna see a not so faux meltdown over this Tobias?
So when you said ALL you didn't mean ALL then? Oh right it was just a lazy generalisation (which is what I said) And the evidence that Cameron, Osborne et al are all current beak heads is where exactly? Or was that merely another lazy generalisation? Your last sentence being posted without a hint of irony is ****ing hilarious given the context.
You could have just said "BBF I disagree" and here is why, but nope, you turn it into your usual partisan Tobes meltfest Where are your wingmen PJ and Terrifictraore
