Should the word Lovren be censored?

the most foul word on earth, Lovren can be used to discriminate/insult/punish any person who is called it.

Example:

Guy 1: Sorry I forgot to give you that money
Guy 2: you will be you absolute Lovren
Guy 3: too far man.

The word alone makes me feel ill when I see it, if ****, ****, **** and even **** has to be censored then Lovren should follow.

Please vote yes and make your voice heard.

 

No, just the player.

 

Just voted yes, can't hang about, need to go the karzie for a Lovren.

 

Can it be used as a verb as well?

Guy1 - How did the exam go?
Guy2 - I absolutely Lovrened it!
Guy1 - Too bad mate, can always try again next year.

 

I feel sorry for Lovren. Skrtel has been worse this season but The focus is on Lovren because of the massive error he made against West Ham.

 

They've both been **** mate everyone one is aware of that Lovren has just been a little more ****.

 

You still banging this drum?

 

This post is a steaming pile of L*vren Even Hyppia, Hughes or Hansen would have suffered playing for this tool.

The focus shouldn't be on any of the players at the moment....the blame for the team being ****e is entirely on Brent's shoulders and the blame for us being managed by him still lies with the yanks....they run the club, they picked the manager, they still haven't appointed a single person who has done a good job with regards to our on field performances bar Kenny who they went and ****ing sacked bunch of ****ing L**rens let him have another season after last year?? A season where we didn't qualify for CL (despite the competition being distinctly average), we didn't win a trophy or even get to a final (two things we did under the previous manager who they gave the bullet). They then sacked his backroom staff but still left Rodgers in charge....bizarre. These ****ers have employed Rodgers, Pascoe, Ayre, Gordon and Jen Chang (scumbag bastard) amongst others.
In a way I actually fear them sacking Brenda because I dread to think who their next bright idea will be

 

I think I mentioned something similar before - for me, we know the players are **** but that's not their fault. They're playing at their level. The manager is at fault for signing/picking them.

 

Yet he isn't always is he Jimmy. He's at fault for not having a clue how to play them but the owners are at fault for our bizarre recruitment committee (****est idea ever)...."here you go Brendan you pick a couple, ok Mike now it's your turn....anyone else want to throw a few names in, let the tea lady have a turn too". ****ed up way to run a football club.

 

What? Not the committee....? You surprise me

 

Exactly. One man should run a football club. If FSG don't want Brod to have sole control then make him a coach and give that power to someone else but FFS, don't split the responsibility.

(for the record, I think the manager should be in overall control of all football related matters including transfers)

 

FSG have been rank amateur since they took over ownership, they listened to fellow yanks they believed were "soccer experts"
They're as much to blame as Rodgers and his rake of flop signings.

 

I think that is a bit harsh. They've not been great when organising on field stuff (including transfers) but off field wise they have been superb. They have massively increased income streams and finally got the stadium improvements in place too. They have been exactly what we wanted after the fiasco that was H&G. They just need to learn to leave the footballing side to someone that knows what they're doing. They should make Kenny Chairman and let him run that side of things

 

I think that's harsh tbh.

They've provided the resource for team building and are in the process of sorting out your ground issue, that's all you can ask isn't it?

In terms of the football decisions I think they've been badly advised and have backed some poor judgement calls by those on their wage bill, but I don't think you can blame them for the failings of the actual team.

 

I feel sick

 

You've finally reached enlightenment.

Well done

 

The income streams are the main reason they purchased the club(business before loyalty),increasing the capacity will be pointless if we don't have a team good enough to fill the extra seats.
They have tbf give Rodgers mega dosh for transfers but they should start by paying what ever it takes to get in a proven manager in instead of sticking with an amateurish manager employed on the cheap compared to the better managers in the prem.

 

Not being as bad as Skrtel doesn't make you good.

 

With Americans buying the club, did you ever expect it to be anything else?

I don't care if they're in it for the money, the clubs needs to be successful for them to maximise their profits. Ultimately, they have the same goal.