Now this is theory, on the left is Bush snr with Nixon and on the right is somebody standing outside of a building in Dallas Boston when JFK was assassinated, some say it's George Bush snr, pointing to the way the wrists are cocked in the pockets, same height same hairline jaw and suit type. Bush snr was not supposed to be in Dallas that day please log in to view this image The watergate breakin was actually about retrieving this photograph so the theory goes Obviously they failed
It isn;t actually known who actually recruited Nixon in person that bit is speculation, it was done through the republical party, it was done as a group Prescott Bush was part of it. The point was in the context of US presidents being chosen, here is a man Prescott Bush that put two of his people into the white house oval office and also Bush snr also ran the cia. While Prescott funds and invests the nazis that is. That is certaily enough to cast doubt on the electoral process. But you don't care, you just want to play your game. You don't know **** about this but it's me posting so you are ll over it like a cheap aftershave because you cant help yourself
You said it was a conspiracy theory, and then forget you said it when Nixon himself claimed it in his biography, so being wrong, you focus on my error to cover your own mate. Then as usual turn it into a silly pissing contest. meh. Wrong year, wrong Bush, everything else is factual but that's not important, what is important you get jollies
Oh here he goes........ Defcon 2 reached Pardon me for reading what you said about Bush snr, checking the facts and finding out it was completely wrong and it was indeed his father and not him, and having the termerity to point this out to you. Of course this is another subject that you're no doubt a World renowned expert in, despite not knowing which ****ing generation it was.........so I should bow down to your superior knowledge. lol.
Like all clima tards you will deny debate on the subject. They all do. Care to tell me why I am wrong, claiming it alone is as useful as pissing into the wind, I can calling you on ypour claim, back it up.
Post it..... Nixon was selected to stand for Congress in 1945. He had a number of wealthy backers according to what I can find, among them Prescott Bush and the Chandlers (NYT). Hardly the 'hand picked president' that you alluded to though, as it took him until 1969 to achieve that feat. In fact the Bush's ditched him in favour of Goldwater in 1964 after Nixon had lost to Kennedy in 1960.
to be fair mate I will retract the statement, because I am not prepared to get into a lengthy debate about this on Not606, so i shouldnt have brought it up. My fault.
Right then, as I originally said, I didn't question the thrust of your story, per se, in that Nixon had powerful and shadowy backers. The film with Anthony Hopkins in said as much. But when you referred to Bush snr you meant Bush granddad, and you meant the 40's and not the 60's. You can see, perhaps, why people had doubts with the details? And btw, you've got the war wrong too. I cited WWII, not WWI. And if you're making big claims, details are important. remember the 737 claim that was actually a 767? I won't labour the point.
Btw, has the Mail blamed Ed Miliband (or his dad) for this yet? : http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/david-camerons-private-chat-caught-6424056
If I cited WWII it was a typo I did say it was in the 40s did I not.. not wrong war so. dunno what you mean by 737 767, did I mix up plane models or something, and you say it like it actually means something? yes I did make a mistake, I did read it like 10 years ago or somehing where ye all just went out and checked it after seeing my post. When I post from memory it happens, seems to be more the older I get, and you hold that against me? Bush was still not serving in the pacific as you claimed, but your errors are ok I guess. Bush was discharged september 45. Nixon was recruited in 46 so he could indeed have been involved in some way And yeah, Prescott and the Robber barons, known to pretty much run the US between them and the Mafia, I guess you won't read that in text books, they owned people like LBJ and Hoover, who was a cross dressing homosexual, something easily used to control him and he was head of the FBI. The VP Johnson who got sworn in after JFK was shot, involved in 6 murders and indicted by a court in Texas. Texas Grand Jury has officially indicted and found Lyndon Baines Johnson guilty as a co-conspirator (from his association with Malcolm Wallace, Billie Sol Estes and Edward Clark) in the following murders: The killing of Henry Marshall (the Agriculture Secretary) The killing of George Krutelnik (an FBI informant who worked for Estes) The killing of Ike Rogers and his secretary The killing of Harold Orr (an FBI informant who worked for Estes) The killing of Coleman Wade (an FBI informant who wqorked for Estes) The killing of Josefa Johnson (LBJ’s own sister!) The killing of John Kinser (Josefa’s boyfriend) Add JFK to that list and his own ****in sister is in that list ffs... Remember the Nazi coup plan? Prescott Bush again but the guy they asked to lead it lead them on and blew their cover at the last minute but.. yep, they got away with it And doesn't this look like Bush outside the Book repository the day JFK was shot. Not saying it's him but it sure looks like him Hell of a coincidence he has a doppelganger right there on that day. please log in to view this image
Talking of ragged trousers, did you see the Daily Fail's latest hatchet job on Corbyn? They pathetically slagged him off for wearing comfortable clobber on a hot day. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...low-left-winger-picked-run-Labour-London.html What about Boris, looks like he's just stuck his finger in an electric socket.
Once comments are reduced to the physical appearance or dress of a person it is scraping the barrel, and suggests said party can't find a rational argument against their targets stance on a subject, whether political or not. It's like kids arguing and the one who realises he has lost says "Well your Mum has a big nose and your Dad's fat"
Politics all over mate, appearance over substance, Corbyn is not concerned with appearance. He dresses horribly because he's lacking narcissism.
Pretty much. The labour right have a real fear of Corbyn. Because he will purge them if he can and he'd be right Labour are infested with neoliberals, Thatcher was neoliberal.. now they infest Labour right
Still think Labour will be unelectable under Corbyn. They will probably lurch to the left for 10 yrs then suddenly we will have "new Labour" mark 2, and it will be back to the middle ground
