Off Topic Syrian refugees

No point Comm, some people are just set in their ways and don't understand that things have changed. Others simply haven't got a clue what they're talking about.

 

Seems that way Terry.

 

Wether people are being massacred by guns on the ground or from bombs in the sky, it makes no difference, someone still has to pull the trigger on innocent people.

You can say **** happens, but it doesn't mask the fact that we have slaughtered 1000s upon 1000s of innocents, no matter how our government dress it up.

A Britain gets beheaded and we are in uproar, but say **** happens when their folk get blown to smithereens.

 

Settle down Harbhajan Singh

 

Do you ever understand anything?

Slow boy.

 

talking out of your arse daft lad, before you make a statement check the facts, show me proof

 

the nearest you get to any conflict would be ****ting your kegs

 

I passed through the chunnel into france nearly three weeks ago and returned last Monday. I'm pleased to say not a migrant in sight either time. I presume the French must have shifted them all......to Hungary?

 

If Russia goes in to Syria to help Assad, would anyone have a problem with that?

 

Lesser of two evils. Plus there are lessons to be learnt from removing Saddam from Iraq.

I wonder how much 'friendly fire' they'd take from the U.S.

 

I was reading that today. The Americans are concerned. Yeh? So?

There are several sides to that situation. But one side needs to win, ultimately to take on ISIS.

So if the Russians are going to give that a go, fine by me.

The sooner that civil war gets sorted, the sooner the Syrian refugee crisis eases up.

 

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/wor...ears-on-at-least-116000-civilians-killed.html

Want any further proof? Or will that be sufficient?

 

That's not the same as actually targetting civilians which was the original point.

 

Most deaths would have been sectarian murders between the Shia and Sunni. They were slaughtering each in the thousands, mostly by car bombings.

 

you fekking useless ****er, i wanted proof of British soldiers shooting unarmed civilians, and you give a line showing deaths from American air strikers, with no mention of how many were used as human shields to try and save them, thick as a bag of **** you are

 

We are a part of a coalition with the US that drops bombs on the Middle East every day.

Every day there are civilians killed from the bombs we drop, and wether it's planes or drones, someone has to pull the trigger knowing innocent civilians will die.

Are you really that stupid, that you think shooting someone innocent with a gun is different than blowing someone innocent up with a bomb? Either way, people die, and either way, someone pulls the trigger.

http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/british-soldiers-killed-186-innocent-4915208

Read down, and you'll see we killed 29 innocent with one air strike.

So are you telling me, the people behind the drone couldn't see the 29 innocent?

I love our British soldiers, and respect them for the heroic work that they do. They are forced to fight in I ridiculous wars and given orders they cannot turn down.

We waste a lot of money involving ourselves in problems that are not ours, killing our own people and many middle eastern people along the way.

You can paint what ever picture you want to paint in your head, but I for one don't believe we have been clean in any if these wars.

 

Are you familiar with the term 'Collateral Damage'?

There is a distinct difference between pre-meditated murder and collateral damage.

You can post as many links as you like, you have completely missed the point here.

 

What a ****ing spanner that lad is

 

what a dick you are , Neville says quote,You can say **** happens, but it doesn't mask the fact that we have slaughtered 1000s upon 1000s err i mean 29, and those twats were with their leader who was targeted

 

Well I'm not going to provide you with 100s of links, that's just an example. Why don't you have a look for yourself.