Yeah I got that bit wrong But Pelligrini is spot on with his trolling, City won their previous title with much more flair and style. A bit like they did with their 3-0 drubbing of you last week.
Ah well at least I admit I got it wrong instead of going back and editing my comments to try and cover it up
Because Jupiter was in retrograde and there were several solar flares that interrupted electronic devices, which in turn meant that Wenger's radio wasn't working properly (this was before the days of popular internet use) Thus, his analysis of opposition teams was limited and Arsenal only scored 62, 68, 59, 73 and 63 goals
PIXIE, you've provided a flippant answer, in a vain attempt to laugh this off, but everyone can see that you are simply avoiding the question. I think it's about time you cut out the comedy and gave CFC a straight answer.
Well, after CFC claimed it was because Ray Parlour played as a DM , I thought I'd reply with an a equally incredulous answer To be honest, it doesn't really matter how many goals Arsenal scored in those first few seasons. It was enough to win the League, FA cup and the double.
If you'd scored more goals and not been so negative you may have won more than one title in five seasons. Or even a European Cup. United scored 76, 80, 97, 79 and won four titles. But they played three attacking players in the middle of the park: Giggs Becks Scholes, while Arsenal parked the bus with Petit Vieira and Roy Parlour
question - what were the number of goals scored in the years we won the league ? answer - the number required to win the points required to win the league. efficiency. enough said.
But when you parked the bus with three DMs in 98/9 and only scored 59 goals it wasn't enough to win the league, was it? United did
