Transfer Rumours Transfer Rumours thread

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
people have said (on here as well as in media) that rodgers took him to "fix him"... as his ego told him that only a man of his genius could fix such a lost cause. thats how it was said and that's in the end when the dust settles on rodgers short anfield career ;) that he lost his job "buying ****e and his ego lead him to it... just look at balotelli FFS"

I think if we didn't expect a big bid on a 31 goal man going to world cup in the prime of his career from spain then we are fools.

i also think with 75mil pocketed there were any number of better options than markovic and balotelli

we signed bad on telly on the 25th august. markovic was signed middle of july AFTEr saurez sale was agreed. in short that 36mil that should have gone on a proper striker.

If we ran short of options the truth behind why we ran short of options has to come out.

as of now i see zero reason why we needed mr markovic at all at 20mil... given ibe, sterling, coutinho and lallana all lining up. that was a piss poor buy and then to top it all off to put 16mil down late in the window on mario?

nahhhh...

rightly or wrongly rodgers carrer at anfield will be defiend by mario balotelli when lads look back at it. there a litany of piss poor buys, borini, aspas et al.. but badontelly tops the pile.

As i said If i were manager offered that choice.

what rodgers said last DECEMBER;

"And asked if he had any regrets over Balotelli’s move, Rodgers said: “No. I think as a club we felt that was the solution at the time.

“In the summer, we had Rickie Lambert and Fabio Borini was looking as though 100% he was gone.

“Obviously Daniel (Sturridge) has shown in his career so far that he gets injuries.

“So it would be unfair to leave Rickie Lambert, a 32-year-old, as the only striker we had.

“I felt this (Balotelli) was a risk we needed to take and as a group we couldn’t afford not to at the time.

“It was obviously late on and we need to have someone in.

“It’s something that we can’t regret.

“I made it clear at the beginning it was a calculated one and that is why he probably cost the money that he did.”


.......................

It's clear the club made very bad choices during the window.... very bad indeed... but to end up with balotelli or... whomever the other choice was i forget is unforgivable and thats why at the time i said sack the lot of them.

Bollocks. Is Rafa remembered as the guy that brought in aquallani or the guy that won the CL and FAC in his first 2 years?

Atm, Rodgers for me is remembered as the manager that took us closest to winning the league for 25 years, all managers make good and bad signings it's very rare that a manager is only remembered for those.
 
There are two standouts on this forum that were dead set against signing Balotelli; myself and @luvgonzo

I'm sure there will be others (you've just proved you were) that said it would be a mistake too although quite a few came around to the idea just before/after he was signed.

I think a lot said it probably wasn't the best and wouldn't suit us but could see a tiny bit of logic given he obviously has talent. Once it was confirmed, like all signings quite a few got behind him and supported him until he gave us no option but not to
 
Bollocks. Is Rafa remembered as the guy that brought in aquallani or the guy that won the CL and FAC in his first 2 years?

Atm, Rodgers for me is remembered as the manager that took us closest to winning the league for 25 years, all managers make good and bad signings it's very rare that a manager is only remembered for those.

sooo.. rodgers will be remembered for his cup wins then? ok maybe second place i suppose <ok>

you just proved the point BTW

rafa: legend for winning lc and fa cup.... 2009? not so much frankly.

Rodgers: ehhh... well he went on a good run you see and even though ctiy were always likely to win it wer got this close.. if only gerrard hadn't slipped...

nahhhhh... don't think so.... failures get remembered for their failures... funny that <whistle>

hodgson is not really remembered for leaving us in 18th we've blocked that misery out..... he's remembered for signing poulsen and konchesky.
 
There are two standouts on this forum that were dead set against signing Balotelli; myself and @luvgonzo

I'm sure there will be others (you've just proved you were) that said it would be a mistake too although quite a few came around to the idea just before/after he was signed.

**** off i was just as vocal... you just always ignore me so never remember anything i say <ok>
 
  • Like
Reactions: Super G Ted'inho
It's clear the club made very bad choices during the window.... very bad indeed... but to end up with balotelli or... whomever the other choice was i forget is unforgivable and thats why at the time i said sack the lot of them.

The other choice was Eto'o and that piece of **** would have been a far greater insult than Balotelli
 
sooo.. rodgers will be remembered for his cup wins then? ok maybe second place i suppose <ok>

you just proved the point BTW

rafa: legend for winning lc and fa cup.... 2009? not so much frankly.

Rodgers: ehhh... well he went on a good run you see and even though ctiy were always likely to win it wer got this close.. if only gerrard hadn't slipped...

nahhhhh... don't think so.... failures get remembered for their failures... funny that <whistle>

hodgson is not really remembered for leaving us in 18th we've blocked that misery out..... he's remembered for signing poulsen and konchesky.

Youre saying raa isn't remembered for winning the CL and FA cup? (He didn't win the league cup from what I remember so don't know if that's a typo or you're thinking of someone else).

Maybe that's difference between some fans. I like to remember the good things, the successes where as some fans are continually looking at the negatives and want to use them to have another moan because it seems cooler.

I wouldnt say a manager that is at a club more than 2/3 years will be remembered for just 1 signing and mother else in their tenure.

Rodgers hasn't achieved anything yet really, but he still has time. Win a couple of trophies and he'll be remembered for that.
 
no i'm saying you SAID he was and i agreed and said he's not remembered for getting 2nd or reaching a carling cup final either (which he did in 2005)

when (not if) rodgers fails he'll be remembered in the context of said failure... an inevitably when his years are looked back upon the absence of a cup will have mad mario flashed up as an image.... thats jsut the way it is. when sky do prem years 2014/15 they'll only mention suarez going and how awful balotelli was....
 
The other choice was Eto'o and that piece of **** would have been a far greater insult than Balotelli

ahhhh yes.. ****t'o

thts right.. thanks astro.

if i was offered that choice i'd say save the money you'll need it in january.

It was ridiculous to buy markoivc and balotell when faced with suarez leaving (both done after) when the combined fee and wages would have bought a top striker.
 
Eto'o was a shocking move in hindsight, soon as he was shipped out form improved and squad harmony did....

However at £50k a week he was risk free and his wages shipped on to another club now...

One thing we did get from him was goals in his limited appearances, but no effort
 
I'm with MITO - don't waste money on players because they're a last resort. Bide your time and wait for a player is the better option.

There are plenty of options out there but I'm a firm believer that Rodgers wanted a strong target man up front which is why we were linked with Bony and Balotelli, and inevitably didn't go for Lacazette, Son etc etc.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Super G Ted'inho
Eto'o was a shocking move in hindsight, soon as he was shipped out form improved and squad harmony did....

However at £50k a week he was risk free and his wages shipped on to another club now...

One thing we did get from him was goals in his limited appearances, but no effort

ermmmmm.... it wasn't risk free given what happened to your season. you tanked

same as badontelly.
 
ahhhh yes.. ****t'o

thts right.. thanks astro.

if i was offered that choice i'd say save the money you'll need it in january.

It was ridiculous to buy markoivc and balotell when faced with suarez leaving (both done after) when the combined fee and wages would have bought a top striker.

It wasn't that ridiculous - Markovic was bought for the future. Lallana was the one bought to replace Suarez in the starting line up.

Reason I say that is because Rodgers wanted to play 4-2-3-1 - he's always wanted this. Which meant Sturridge played as the lone striker and Lallana would replace Suarez.
 
ermmmmm.... it wasn't risk free given what happened to your season. you tanked

same as badontelly.

If you want to be pedantic then it had a risk on the team that nobody could have predicted, he was the smiling assasin

But as a transfer it was risk free, just £50k a week and then he wanted to leave on a free...not hang about on £50k
 
welllllllll

then thing there is lallan was sought PRIOR to the world cup so if we think lfc had thought squarez was staying then he could not be said replacement. I think given the position rodgers bought lallana to replace coutinho who at the time coudl not last 90mins.

Now 25mil on lallana was atrocious...

but... if suarez left and then after it in comes markoivc and we are left with not enough money to get a good striker? well... at the very worst we should be saying it was extremely poor judgement to buy for the future when the now was lacking.

however you could be right on the 4231... i don't think always is right he started more of a 433 with wide men but 4231 and 433 are not that far apart.
 
If you want to be pedantic then it had a risk on the team that nobody could have predicted, he was the smiling assasin

But as a transfer it was risk free, just £50k a week and then he wanted to leave on a free...not hang about on £50k

fair enough.

e'tto kows that to make the big bucks he just needs to move and get signing on fees
 
fair enough.

e'tto kows that to make the big bucks he just needs to move and get signing on fees

I think the only plus we got from the move was his european experience. You could see the impact he had in a difficult group and how he had the know how to get through the games....no surprise we crashed out once he left.....but our league form improved ten fold<ok>