1. He was goal side of him. 2. You read every word I write. Is lying continually something you have always done? If not tell your doctor it could be a symptom of an issue.
Sorry. But I have a witness if he ever sobers up,that I said it live in real time! Shaks...... Shaks...... Come on.
I am sure he will remember that we went to the peacock. Having received an invite it would have been rude to refuse. But we were stood up. More lies!
Morning troops. Waited 80 minutes for a goal, went to powder my nose, & came back to find it was 1-1. 'kin 'ell!!!! Heyho, a decent performance. We had chances. More of an attacking line up. Byram helped create a few chances. So Chippy,as you didn't see them, will you be taking a trip to Specsavers!!! Too early to decide whether or not it was a good point or 2 points lost. But a decent start.
what you couldn't see from your armchair and I only saw in the second half cos it was right in front of us was him being isolated and not knowing whether to go wide, come inside, take up a back post position for crosses coming from the left. Time and again we had decent possession but he was out of the game in no mans land, he needs to be an outlet He did put in some reasonable balls, worked hard and did manage one really good header back into the middle that with more composure wood should have scored from. But it's not his best position in my opinion.
As far as Im aware I don't read your rubbish it came up that you had replied to my statement so naturally I thought I would see what had offended you this time as I don't want my bins not emptied next week You will never find a more honest sincere person and loyal than me but as you will learn don't ever cross me because I am lethal as you will find out I don't do fools
Fair point Chippy. But it's a new position for him, & I for one expect him to shine as he gets used to it. But time will tell
Ok. In that case see a doctor. You have lost your grip on reality. As a matter of interest why would you want to belittle the bin men, it's a dirty job, someone has to do it, and I for one am glad that ours get emptied. Given they could probably get as much money from signing on I would say fair play to them. There are probably a fair number of people here who make their money from honest manual toil. How far does your contempt for them extend? Joiners, builders, plasterers, electricians, lorry drivers, estate agents. What level of job would be acceptable to you? How do you feel about the unemployed or the disabled?
Burnley fans reckon they should have had 2 stonewall pens. Also said they missed Trippier, Shackell, Ulvestad & Barnes Should Burnley have had 2 penalty's?
We would have been disappointed not have got at least one. The handball was clear. The holding/pulling I have seen them given.
I think they should've had one. It was a hand ball by Bellusci but in fairness to the officials they probably would've have been able to see it unless they were standing where Silvestri was. But saying that, Mowatt should've scored, Wood could've had a couple and Dallas hit the woodwork. We definitely had the better chances imo.
IMO wood was good when we gave him the ball when he was facing their goal( should probably have scored twice). But snatched at the chances. However I am concerned that when we pinged the ball in to him with his back to goal he didn't win a header, was brushed aside. In a Mike type comment I don't see him being any king of hold up play forward... If he is going to work we need to feed to his strengths.
They had two chances first half that missed by inches. Game could have gone either way. Draw was fair. The big positive. 15 shots at goal.... That was 5 games worth last season! Shoot at goal and we will score.
