You seem upset. I don't care what the land is used for. Private residential with allocated 106 is fine. There continues to be a land grab for good sites. If local councils hammer 106 which makes private resi schemes unviable (which most won't as it doesn't solve their major problem which isn't social housing but private or rental housing for the majority of their constituents) then that's fine as they will look favourably on PRS. Either way land still holds its value. In most areas PRS land is now worth more than private residential for the reasons outlined in the article you posted. But you're a Cambridge/Harvard lawyer, guitar, love god so you know all of that.
Why do you keep having a pop? I knew something that you didn't. You're trying to dig your way out of that fact in a way that makes you look big whilst, at the same time, trying to belittle me. Why? Just admit that this is information that is of importance to you.
You haven't got a clue, have you! Do you really believe what you're saying? Do you really have no concept of how this decision could cripple the housing development market?
I very much believe what I'm saying as it's my living not some Walter Mitty fantasy! And I have every understanding of how the housing development market works. As a trader I rely on understanding the market unlike a "lawyer" who simply advises! If they can't buy to sell, they'll buy to build and rent (google PRS, it's the current buzz phrase, the institutions are goings nuts for it and it largely negates 106 which you seem to have such a loose understanding of - despite being one of the world's great property lawyers). In short there's always a buyer. It's what I do day in, day out Walter, not something I google occasionally to try and seem superior so I can "win" discussions with Arsenal fans on an Internet forum.
I wonder whether Alan Mcilwraith is a Spurs fan! If you don't remember the press coverage then look him up!
That is HIAG to a tee ! Makes one outlandish claim, gets exposed, comes back with an even more outlandish claim, gets exposed, then confuses himself with his own bullshit and comes back with a claim that he's already admitted was made up. This line could be written by HIAG himself and reminds me of his current 'Rock God' fantasies: I must admit, magic does help attract the ladies. Women really love my magic - but when guys see them crowding round, they want to get in on the act too and I muscle them out of the way. Women like any tricks to do with money. I have one where I put a pen through a note but leave it intact and they go mad for it. But I have a strict rule for women - if one asks you back to hers after midnight, always say no - you'll be too drunk and she'll turn out to be a minger. It's funny how some people think that the anonymity of the internet will convince people that their bullshit is true, but in the end a Gobshite always ends up giving himself away.
You're estate agent! Oh, sweet Jesus! That explains everything. Yeah, you know it all, pal. Yet, you continue to dodge the point I put to you. You carry on.
That's right, go and find someone who doesn't even know this decision was made, let alone one who has a grasp on what the consequences might be! Shrewd advice.
By contacting you mate, he might get the lowdown on how to get to level 3 on guitar hero, but he's not going to learn anything worthwhile about land and property law and management
Sorry, but I've just read your post again (I ignored most of it on the first reading), and I noticed this... More than anything, this quote convinces me that you are an idiot and haven't got a clue! Who is "they?" I presume you're talking about a typical developer? If so, you have a very little understanding of how most developers make their money, let alone how they generally finance their projects Sure, there are independently wealthy people out there who purchase and build-out residential projects to create stock to put into their own portfolios (and who will be less concerned with the consequences of this decision - although, I will argue that they ought to be), but that isn't tyical - no where near it - and it isn't going to solve the current shortage in reidentail housing-stock across the nation. If you want to, I could educate you on this subject, but you're so consumed with a desire to feed that chip on your shoulder that I wouldn't waste my breath. For the record, I consider estate agents to be bigger parasites than journalists. There is no point to you, not now that we have the internet and digital photography.
"They" refers to buyers. I couldn't care less whether "they" are cash rich or have to leverage to buy, that's not my problem. It's a very simple concept, one that a hot shot lawyer should be able to comprehend. A fantasist might struggle though. I agree about estate agents. I can't stand them and won't deal with them if at all possible.
Nope, I'm a land trader. A hot shot lawyer would know that land traders aren't estate agents. What land traders do is trade land. The clue is in the words land and trader. What's the point I dodged? Share with the group and keep painting yourself into that corner Walter!
Jose Mourinho claims it takes him just 10 minutes to determine whether a youngster can cut it with the champions http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/fo...inutes-determine-youngster-cut-champions.html To the rest of us that's a cheque book manager
That says it's all really. He has no interest in developing youth. Maureen is useless without the chequebook.
You're a glorified estate agent. You cannot see it, because you don't understand enough about property development, and I in no mood to try to educate you, so that you can, with your limited knowledge take more pop-shots to try to make yourself look clever. You keep doing what you do, living in your bubble of ignorance, and I'll keep doing what I'm doing, with my eyes fully open.
