We are not the only club to have spent very little before the start of the new championship season... Championship net spend table so far. Slightly skewed by genuinely undisclosed fees (Brentford & Charlton mainly). please log in to view this image
How can a club spend -9.75 million? That means someone gave them 9.75 million to take the players away!
We didn't. One person's spend is another person's receipt. Our net £18.45m shows we've received that much more than we've spent. But you know that already.
A net spend is positive if you have spent money, negative if you have earned money. The table is incorrect and Hatem is correct.
The table is correct, it doesn't say whether its net spend or net receipts. I may have been wrong by putting spend, but as I didn't specify who had spent the money then technically I'm right, if confusing. How many angels do you think can get on the top of a pin?
Are Brentford going to take our money or what? They don't want to sell either player to us by all accounts
Release clauses have been in footballers contracts for a while, When we bought Ricketts, in 2006, the 300,000 fee triggered a minimum Release clause in his contract...
Just typed 'Karl Bigvern Brown' into Facebook, you're Hull City and Hull FC through and through I can't fault you on that. I'll only moan at you when you type 'Our Kid said..." They trying to use our 3.5m trigger as bait for more money from PL clubs, Everton are supposed to be interested, not too sure how much I believe that. There's a good chance he'll come here, not too sure if he'll get as much game time elsewhere. Hope he's not to replace Elmo, would love to see a 442 with them 2 overlapping