Spurs have spent less since the Premier League began and that's not including your enormous wage bill.
I love it that all you Spuds can come up with is wages. When you don't even know what Arsenal's wage structure consists of. Desperation at its finest
But, what happens if you add in all the wages spent by each club, over all those seasons, PISKIE? Does that change the picture, at all?
No, you are wrong Gross Sold Net 8.Tottenham £624,500,000 £484,817,500 £139,682,500 9 .Arsenal £541,565,000 £405,174,000 £136,391,000
I never thought I'd see the day when PISKIE would get so desperate as to invent "facts" to try to finally win an argument! It's a sad day for all of us.
Don't shoot the messenger because you're upset about the results http://www.transferleague.co.uk/pre...ague-tables/premier-league-table-1992-to-date
How about this for a lovely stat Wenger + 18 seasons = 3 league titles "Maureen" + 5 seasons = 3 league titles
HAHA just got what the Spuds are talking about. That doesnt count this summer Arsenals spending this summer puts them ahead by a nose
It doesn't include last year, either. The difference is about £80m and that's before including all the dubious figures on that site.
Anyway. I don't really have a problem with Spurs' spending. They spend what they earn, even though they've won **** all. Arsenal spend what they earn and have won a truck load of trophies. Chelsea spend a truck load of Romans cash, if they had been forced to spend what they earned since the premier league began. I suspect they trophy haul would be on a par with Spurs'