Hull City fans look to strengthen heritage rules

The one that explained to me it didn't get involved because it was tired. It was done to death at the time, but still gets brought up by others, although I tend to get the blame for it cropping up again.

 

Why do you always appear to have difficulty answering a simple question with a simple answer.

 

I don't.

I try to give a more complete answer. That was a time of transition, and several names were used, but the as the fans group at the time was the one that told maynthey existed, I was trying to avoid the bit where which ever name I offered was claimed not to exist.

Ultimately, the hcst is in essence the tigers co-op trading as Hull City Supporters Trust, the core existed despite the ultimate name change.

 

Excellent. Well done although a simple CTWD, HCST, COOP or OSC would have done the trick just as well.

 

You'd expect so wouldn't you. Unfortunately, experience has shown it's rarely received that simply.

 

I can't recall a time that you ever tried responding with a simple answer. Try now.

 

I just did, and the explained life isn't always black and white. Sometimes people ask loaded questions or logical fallacies. They try adding bits to the question to fit their prejudices.

I find full better than just simple.

 

I cant see anything on your website that is Allam in or supportive of them.

Who organises your vision for the future then? You Exiled Gretton and PLT all think they should **** off. Yet its never come up in conversation at the full committee whether to support them or not.
No condemnation of the Allam Out stuff either.
Get off the fence. You may jsut get more support by opposing them.

 

OK, more bollocks.

You make a statement, that's bollocks, then try to hide it with further bollocks. Load of bollocks really.

The statement you made needed nothing more than black or white to substantiate it. Unfortunately you're unable to do so as you're aware it was bollocks.

Back to the music, I find you boring nowadays.

 

So you agreed the supporters group said it was tired, now you think it was bollocks.

Cheers for the worked example of a simple answer. <OK>

 

It's a DMD thread. Spout bollocks, try to be a clever ****, spout more bollocks, denial, try to be a cleverer ****, spout more bollocks, turn the argument around, skirt around the issue, spout ****, get shown up as a prick, be boring, spout bollocks, try to be a clever ****, continue to skirt around the issue ...

What supporter's group was that?

 

Come off it. Thats ridiculous and you know it.

 

Nurse.

 

Ok that made me laugh.

He is like his lapdog.

 

A bit like someone suggesting people crossing the road at pelican crosses should wait until the little man is on green as this would reduce the chances of being hit by a vehicle and some eejit posting that this was saying it was condoning drivers mowing them down?

 

Why would they want to engage positively with a bunch of people who are not prepared to publicly state their own views on the ownership of the club? Obviously the ones that do state their views on forums such as this seem to be of the view that they wish the Allams would **** off, or in some particular cases, die.

Bottom line is for all the clever PR you think you put out, HCST is perceived as Anti Allam. Sickeningly condescending mission statements or objectives won't change that. Your membership numbers would be a lot higher if you worked on that.

Obviously you won't, because you think you're in the right, and anyone disagreeing with you is wrong, and in fact irrelevant. Nobody tells you how to run a Trust.

Sure, you'll say it's just me you don't want, but your arrogant attitude is absolutely costing you members. Its a shame you don't see that, and won't do a thing about it.

And, I'll say it again, it's obvious why you wouldn't want a yes/no to the question about ownership because with a chairman who thinks a hipflask with an offensive "joke" about the owner and members like PMT, we already know the truth, no matter how much you don't want it to be true.

 

I think your post there is a pretty good example of what I meant, but not for the reasons you're trying to spin.

How dull is it that these debates just end up with pissy attempts at personal abuse and petty point scoring when there are so many real and serious issues to address.

Some on here are more Allamesque than Allam.

 

Your like a kid sticking his fingers in his ears and shouting over someone because you don't like what their saying.