Try reading my line. It might help you in future there fella. My line is that your lot have jumped all over the AJ case, you even use the word nonce here, without a shred of evidence. However, is Cisse denouncing this child as not being his? No. Is he denying he is married and committed bigamy? No. Baring in mind the mothers age and the child's age is there any doubts as to the age of the girl? No. Did he have a sex with an under 16 when he was over 16? If you think they didn't then your more naive than I already think. Yes, if (and until any trial its just that if) Johnson is found guilty, not one safc fan will support him yet Cisses actions are being dismissed as just two kids experimenting (even though at 16 he'd have known it was wrong) and as a bigamist an relationship disaster many of your clan are excusing it. The stench of hypocrisy and double standards eminating from Sid James is rank.
Yeah sorry mate I was out of line last night, apologies to all posters for that. No hypocrisy from me though, you won't catch me defending Cisse. Mitigating, yes, but he's stilly guilty of being a disgusting and immoral scumbag, and I label Johnson as the same if the stories turn out to be true.
I'm sure your apology is given with best intentions JC, so that's appreciated from me at least. I hope others do so as well. I hope you'll also appreciate that, whilst AJ's case is sub judice, he's one of ours and we will defend him to the hilt. Innocent until proven guilty is the law of the land and goes for all, mackems geordies, cockneys, scousers, whoever. But if he's found guilty, you won't find a single mackem on here defending him. And rightfully so. The law will decide whether he's guilty or not. If he's guilty, open the floodgates on the abuse. He'll deserve all he gets. If he's innocent, leave the guy alone to rebuild his life. Just to add, Funky is a top, top bloke, and in spite of the fact you're a mag, I've got a lot of time for you too! Last night got a little too unnecessary and personal. We're all better than that.
Time and time again it's proven that alcohol and football forums don't mix, I had my moment last night, it won't happen again I defend absolutely your right to defend Johnson, and have repeatedly said that anything I assert against him is only on the proviso that he is found guilty. It's hypothetical. Some could take a leaf out of their own book when judging Cisse on the basis of a Sun headline, IMO?
Booze and forums make the best reading sometimes. I often re read the next day and think wtf did i write. As its impossible to understand.
That's usually no problem Comm! Its the stuff you write when you're sober that scrambles my brain and makes my eyes bleed!
