Some people may not like this, but in their "culture" - "religion", call it what you want, it's acceptable. No it isn't, it's uncivilised. It's barbaric. Not saying what Cisse has allegedly done is right, but the way they go on, it's the norm.
My tiny, minuscule ITK about this is that my lass has friends in the Senegalese community over here, and has been on holiday to Senegal. Just about every bloke has several wives. It's not shagging someone else behind your lass's back, it's the norm, they're open about it. Obviously to a westerner such a society is incomprehensible, but that's how it is, I can't understand it, but that's how they live. My lass often makes the comment that the best thing the west could offer Senegal is a mountain of condoms. The families cannot look after the number of kids they have. The Muslim clergy try to take care of hordes of street kids, but even for them there is a limit. So ends a second-hand report on life in Senegal ;-)
What a lot of rot If you are trying to make out that there is little to no difference between a 27 year old shagging a 15 year old in England and a 16 year old shagging a 13 year old in a country where it is socially acceptable, then you are unfortunately either sympathetic toward *****s or just trolling. You choose. In fact, claiming that a 27 year old shagging a 15 year old is not a nonce probably answers the question It's absolutely staggering that you would attempt to call me creepy while saying that a late twenties man shagging a 15 year old doesn't make him a *****. I'd hate to know what skeletons you have in your closet mate...
I know, In my moral head that a 13 year old is a child who should never be striped of her innocence and impregnated at such an early stage of adult development regardless of the partners age customs or religion. I also know a 15 year old is young adult, often sexually active and often passing themselves off as an adult. I've also got the brains to realise the difference between a 13 year old and 15 year old in terms of development is ****ing massive. So you make yourself look like a creepy weirdo just because of club rivalry. I'll reiterate if either have done it they're scum of the ****ing earth. But ****ing children that young or younger is about the most vile disgusting act a person could commit. You can confuse a 13 year old as under 21 but you can with a 15 year old. To suggest somebody ****ing young woman is worse than ****ing a child is rank. **** off you dirty bastard. Surprised you haven't converted to Islam and move to Africa you vile little ****.
You are drawing up your own boundaries and passing them off as fact. To say that "13 year olds are children" while "15 year olds have matured into young adults" is astonishingly narrow sighted and I can't quite believe what I'm reading.
I take great pride in being able to make the skin crawl of someone who would stoop to being a ***** sympathiser over something as frivolous as football rivalry. Disgusting man, just ****ing vile. Night.
I've got a 13 year old son and he looks about 21 now, my daughter is 14 nearly 15 and she looks about 18/19, I think they are maturing quite a lot now but if any 16 year old tried it in with my daughter he would have no balls left put it that way. My son on the other hand is starting to attract 16/17 year old girls and is starting to notice he might be able to have a bit of fun, have told him to wait till he is 16 but he is nearly 6ft now and I don't think he wants to listen to me.
Don't you know? By the universal laws of Funky Dick all 13 year olds are still children and completely undeveloped, while all 15 year olds have matured into young adults. Silly you. The more I think about it, the more his username makes sense.
I don't sympathiser, you are. I've said repeadely said they're both scum if true. You've made excuses such as background. I'm speaking with western head because I am western what the **** are you on about? Why don't you move to Africa if it's acceptable for 13 year old to raped over there in your mind? I think it's a no no where ever in the ****ing world it happens. But it's socially acceptable over their so that makes it a less of an evil in your mind clearly. You're talking about a 13 year old, a little girl. You horrible little bastard. My sentiments haven't changed since you agreed with me, but you making excuses made me pipe up you vile little prick. You had to turn it into team rivalry and make excuses. Sad ****ing moron.
Thought you were going? Off to offer 13 year old virgins around because it socially acceptable no doubt. Prick.
I believe one of my first quotes on the subject, if you care to take the 30 seconds it will take to read, were that "if true, both are complete and utter scum". SO the only facts we've established are: 1) We both think a 16 year old shagging a 13 year old is scummy and disgusting 2) We both think a 27 year old shagging a 15 year old is scummy 3) You think shagging a 15 year old as a 27 year old doesn't make you a nonce. FACTS. They don't come out well for you, despite all you're squirming and twisting and trying to turn it on me. EDIT: my actual quote, on my very first post on the matter, was "disgusting and immoral". So we'll add liar to ***** sympathiser on your list of discrepancies.
Reported, making actual accusations of *****philia, too far. Would like to draw this to the attention of the mods on this page too. You deranged ****.
Could you please post the link to or quote from where Bri/Funky sympathises with *****s? I've "known" this poster for years on this site and I think he utterly despises *****s. By "*****s" of course I mean people who have been accused of such a crime and found guilty in a court of law. I don't know if you have another definition. That is the general definition, and the reason why innocent until proven guilty is the benchmark in English/British courts. Otherwise anyone could accuse anyone of anything. Loads of accusations have been proven correct in past cases - and loads have been proven utter bollocks.
If you go and learn how to spell it... Look, I'm leaving this here now as I've reported you for your earlier comment. A line has to be drawn at actual assertions of *****phile activity. Hopefully it won't have to go any further as it is a clearly libellous statement and one I won't be letting lie. Goodnight.
