We're as good as down. ****ing awful ****ty pinstripes. The goalie jerseys **** too. Maulled have a ****ing word
Thank ****, they did the right thing with the sponsor and made it black with a white outline. I don't mind it too much. Bar the badge and majority amber socks, of course. They're ****ing travesties.
The "Land" is big but the "Flamingo" isn't very prominent. If I was a shirt sponsor I wouldn't be very happy. I suppose it was difficult to fit in within the size allowed. I suppose the deal is only a few hundred quid a year.
Just noticed the coin machine, they have those in Florida cost 51 cents or 30p, £1.01 in England rip off
1. This kit is awful and one of the worst in recent seasons. 2. It looks like a League One or Two kit. 3. The sponsor is embarrassing and now i've seen it on a shirt it's even worse than I thought. 4. The new badge in my opinion looks great and far better than the last one which was incredibly outdated and the fonts used where outdated. I like the minimalist look of the new badge and whilst I respect some people opinion to prefer the older badge I suspect that some dullards say it out of the consumption and obsession with the NO to Hull Tigers. If this Hull Tigers bid is really over then there are going to be a lot of people out there with nothing to do or talk about. 5. I'd accuse Umbra of pure laziness with this because I have seen far better kits recently by them.
What does that even mean? Can you elaborate (give a bit more detail) about what makes a shirt look league one or two?
Why don't we ever sell any of our shirts from years gone by ?. I am sure they would be a market for them ( not Walton St ! )
So... you're pretty much going for the opposite opinion of everyone else? You are Dumbarse and I claim my £5.